Hepatitis C Board decisions

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an effective date prior to February 26, 2005 for a 100 percent rating for hepatitis C with cirrhosis and related conditions.

The appeal has been withdrawn by the appellant before a decision was made.

The Veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of cold injury to both hands and feet, face and ears, hepatitis C, and hypertension have been denied.,Service connection is not granted for any of the conditions listed.

The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran's hepatitis C is related to service, and this includes obtaining relevant medical records from Vietnam. The Veteran also needs clarification on whether he still wishes to have a hearing before the Board.

The Board has granted service connection for hepatitis C and remanded the issues of increased rating for left knee chondromalacia and TDIU. The Veteran's low back disorder is related to his active duty service, while the nature and severity of his left knee disability need further clarification.

The Veteran's end stage liver disease with hepatitis C was found to be permanently and totally disabling as of May 16, 2000. The appellant is considered a stepchild who has been in the Veteran's household since he married her mother on October [redacted], 1995. Basic eligibility for DEA benefits under Chapter 35 of Title 38 was granted from May 16, 2000.

The Veteran's hepatitis C has been rated at a noncompensable level since July 28, 2003. The Board found that the symptoms of fatigue and nausea have not required dietary restriction or continuous medication, but do meet criteria for a 10% evaluation.

The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for peptic ulcer disease, hepatitis C, residuals of a concussion, and an acquired psychiatric disability (including depression and bipolar disorder) as there is no evidence demonstrating current diagnoses or showing a link to service.

The Board found new and material evidence to reopen the claim of service connection for hepatitis C. However, it determined that there is no evidence to support a finding that the Veteran's hepatitis C was incurred in or aggravated by his active service. The right foot disorder remains at 30 percent disability rating, but the Veteran does not meet criteria for TDIU due to service-connected disability.

The Board found no evidence of a psychiatric disorder during service and concluded that the Veteran's current condition is not related to his military service.,There was also insufficient evidence linking the Veteran's hepatitis C to any service-connected disability.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.

The Board has remanded the case for further examination and opinion regarding service connection for Hepatitis C, as well as a determination on whether an increased rating is warranted for the Veteran's dorsolumbar SFW scar.

The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have diabetes, hypertension, an eye disability, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, or hepatitis C that is attributable to his period of active service.

The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a liver disorder, including hepatitis C and NAFLD/NASH, finding that there was no chronic disease in service or at any time thereafter.

The Board found that hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and denied the Veteran's claim for service connection.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's hepatitis C is not service-connected due to his own willful misconduct involving intravenous drug use.

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling VA examinations.

The Board denied service connection for hepatitis C and the claim under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151, finding no evidence to support a direct link between the Veteran's military service and his current condition.

The Board has determined that additional development is needed to properly adjudicate the Veteran's claims for service connection for a right knee disorder and hepatitis C. The case is being remanded to obtain new VA examinations, as well as any relevant treatment records.

The Board found that the preponderance of evidence is against a causal link between the Veteran's currently manifested hepatitis C and active service or any inservice risk factors, aside from intravenous drug use, which constitutes misconduct.