Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2003
707 indexed Board decisions in 2003.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2003
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to fully and fairly consider the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, a low back disorder, and hypertension. The RO will obtain complete service medical records and any relevant personnel records from the service department, as well as post-service medical records. They will also schedule the veteran for VA examinations to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2003
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim of service connection for hypertension and found that new and material evidence had been submitted. The claim is now considered on its merits.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for hypertension, finding that there is no legal merit to the claim as it pertains to compensation purposes. The issue remains on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board denied service connection for a psychiatric disorder, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. The veteran's gout was rated at 40 percent based on its active process.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's heart disorder and hypertension are related to his active service, leading to a grant of service connection for both conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2003
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and a need for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board of Veterans' Appeals found that the veteran does not have hypertension and therefore, it was not incurred in or aggravated by active service.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2003
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for service connection for a psychiatric disorder, hypertension, and hiatal hernia with gastrointestinal reflux disease and history of peptic ulcer disease due to new evidence presented. However, the Board did not find that these conditions are related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2003
The Board has granted a higher initial evaluation of 40 percent for the service-connected diabetes mellitus, effective from February 2001. The issue of an increased rating for hypertension remains pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2003
The Board has granted secondary service connection for the veteran's polycystic kidney disease, finding that it was aggravated by his service-connected hypertension and PTSD. The other issues remain unresolved.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The veteran's claim for service connection for polysubstance abuse is denied as it falls under a legal prohibition due to the nature of the condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board found that the appellant's heart disease and hypertension did not manifest within one year after separation from active military service, nor were they incurred or aggravated by any incident of active military service. Therefore, the claims for service connection for both conditions are denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2003
The Board found that the appellant's left knee disorder, back injury, cervical myositis, bilateral varicose veins, hypertension, and bilateral hearing loss are not service-connected. The assigned disability ratings for his left knee disorder were upheld at 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a heart disorder, including congestive heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy with syncope and high blood pressure. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2003
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete documentation and needs further evaluation of the veteran's lung mass and hypertension claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2003
The Board has determined that it is at least as likely as not that the appellant's diagnosed multi-joint pain is related to Desert Shield/Storm service, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2003
The Board finds that the evidence is in relative equipoise regarding whether the veteran's hypertension, esophageal reflux disease, hiatal hernia, and teeth enamel erosion are proximately due to or aggravated by his service-connected post-traumatic stress disorder.,Therefore, the claims for these conditions have been granted as secondary to PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for headaches, bilateral hearing loss, residuals of left inguinal hernia repair, residuals of postoperative nasal septoplasty, and bilateral renal nephrocalcinosis with hypertension. The preponderance of evidence did not support a higher rating in any of these cases.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board denied service connection for cause of the veteran's death due to lack of evidence linking hypertension, dysentery, and beriberi (to include beriberi heart disease) to service. The appellant is also not entitled to accrued benefits as no claims were pending at the time of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2003
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, which he claims is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The appeal will be remanded for further development and consideration.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.