Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2004
1,028 indexed Board decisions in 2004.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for arthritis and hypertension, finding that new evidence was not received to reopen his claim of a psychiatric disorder. The RO also found that there is no causal relationship between the claimed conditions and military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2004
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development due to the need for VCAA compliance.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board denied service connection for hypertension and the increased ratings for cervical spine degenerative disc disease and lumbar spine strain. The veteran was not granted any benefits in these claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2004
The VA has granted service connection for hypertension and assigned a 10 percent disability evaluation, effective from March 5, 2001. The veteran's current blood pressure readings do not meet the criteria for an increased rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for memory loss, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and muscle pain and weakness. The decision also noted that the veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his muscle condition was granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2004
The Board has remanded the claim of service connection for right lower quadrant pain to include diverticulitis due to a procedural issue regarding the timeliness of the notice of disagreement. The ratings for hypertension and migraine headaches are addressed in another decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The VA denied service connection for hypertension, which the veteran claimed was secondary to his service-connected Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. The VA also denied service connection for swelling of the legs, which the veteran claimed was secondary to his service-connected Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.,Service connection for both conditions could not be established as they were not shown to have been present during or within one year following service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for hypertension, arteriosclerotic heart disease with coronary artery disease, and a tender and painful scar. The Board found no persuasive medical nexus evidence linking these conditions to his active military service or to his service-connected PTSD.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2004
The veteran's appeal has been withdrawn due to the veteran's request for withdrawal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board found no evidence of asbestosis, pulmonary condition due to lead-based paint, hypertension, or type II diabetes mellitus in service records. The veteran's claims for these conditions were denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2004
The veteran's appeal was dismissed because he died during the pendency of his appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board has denied the veteran's claim of service connection for hypertension as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. The medical evidence does not support a link between the veteran's current hypertension and his service-connected diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and a higher rating for diabetes associated with herbicide exposure, but granted a compensable rating for residuals of fracture of proximal first left metatarsal and night blindness.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2004
The Board has granted the petition to reopen the claim for service connection for a skin disorder and remanded the hypertension claim for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining military treatment records and clarifying representation.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The VA determined that the veteran's hypertension does not warrant a disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent, as his blood pressure readings do not meet the criteria for higher ratings based on diastolic or systolic pressure.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and benign prostatic hypertrophy, finding no evidence of these conditions during his period of active duty. The claim for indirect inguinal hernia was denied in a final rating decision, and new and material evidence to reopen this claim has not been provided.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a right knee disorder and an increased evaluation for his left knee disability, both of which were pending at the time of his death. The appeals are denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2004
The veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension that he believes is secondary to his service-connected Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2. The case has been remanded due to the need for additional development of medical records and clarification of the relationship between the conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2004
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to fully and fairly consider the veteran's claims, including obtaining verification of his claimed stressors and a VA examination for his spine disorder.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.