Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2006
1,365 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2006
The Board finds that the veteran's hypertension began during his military service and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for additional development due to failure of the veteran to report for scheduled VA examinations.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board found that the veteran's hypertension is not related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II and thus denied the claim for secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension, sleep apnea, and kidney disorder began during his military service. Service connection is granted for all three conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2006
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension, finding that the veteran's condition was manifested within one year of his separation from active duty. Service connection for hepatitis C is denied as there is no medical evidence linking it to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a higher initial evaluation and an earlier effective date for service connection due to lack of evidence supporting either claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board has ordered the case to be remanded for a VA hypertension examiner to provide an opinion on whether the veteran's service-connected PTSD aggravates his hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board found that the veteran's flat feet were not incurred in or aggravated by active service and denied his claim. The Board also found that hypertension and congestive heart failure were not incurred in or aggravated by active service and may not be presumed to have been incurred in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board found that the veteran's hypertension was not incurred or aggravated during his active duty service, ACDUTRA, or INACDUTRA. The evidence did not establish a medical nexus between the veteran's current hypertension and his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension was not incurred in or aggravated by service, and is not related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. Therefore, the claim for service connection for hypertension is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The veteran seeks service connection for hypertension, which the Board has remanded due to incomplete medical records from Dr. Moore.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board denied service connection for hypertension, including as secondary to diabetes mellitus type II. The evidence did not show a nexus between the veteran's current diagnosis of hypertension and his period of service or any service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The VA denied an increased evaluation for the veteran's service-connected coronary artery disease and hypertension, finding that his disability is no more than a 30 percent disabling.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board found that the veteran's hypertension was not incurred in service and is not related to his diabetes mellitus. The pulmonary disability claim has been remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2006
The veteran withdrew his appeal for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for hypertension before the Board could make a decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for service connection, but denied them on their merits as there is no evidence of in-service injury or disease that would support a finding of service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board has ordered the appellant to undergo VA examinations for tinnitus, esophageal reflux and dysmotility, and hypertension. The case is remanded due to failure to report for these examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2006
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for service connection for a respiratory disorder and hypertension, which is claimed to be secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The veteran needs to undergo VA examinations to determine the nature, extent, and etiology of any respiratory disorder and hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and heart disease, finding no evidence of a causal relationship between these conditions and his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2006
The Board found that the grant of service connection for hypertension in October 1997 was clearly and unmistakably erroneous due to incorrect application of regulations. The veteran's active duty service records did not show treatment or diagnosis of hypertension, but he testified about experiencing high blood pressure during his active duty service and receiving treatment for it.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.