Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2007
1,721 indexed Board decisions in 2007.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The veteran's claims for service connection of seizures, high blood pressure (hypertension), and depression have been denied. The RO has assigned a 20 percent evaluation for the right thumb disorder since May 1983 under Diagnostic Code 5224.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2007
The veteran's claim for additional vocational rehabilitation training under Chapter 31, Title 38, United States Code is granted due to her service-connected disabilities and the need for further education in a suitable field.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The veteran's conditions do not meet the criteria for special monthly pension based on need for regular aid and attendance or by reason of being housebound.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2007
The Board has dismissed the appellant's appeals regarding service connection for chronic back pain, alopecia areata, and hypertension due to his withdrawal of these issues prior to a decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2007
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a medical opinion regarding whether the veteran's hypertension is aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension with erectile dysfunction does not warrant a compensable disability rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for hypertension and asthma were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the applicable VA rating schedule.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The Board found that the veteran's hypertension did not start during service or within one year of discharge, and was not caused by any incident of service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The Board found that the veteran's hypertension was not incurred in or aggravated by his active duty military service, is not proximately due to or the result of his service-connected wrist disabilities, and cannot be presumed to have been incurred in or aggravated by such service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected schizophrenia aggravated his hypertension, which in turn contributed to his atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and ultimately caused his death. As such, the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability is not service-connected.,His sinusitis has been rated as 30 percent disabling, and the evidence does not meet criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2007
The Board has reopened the previously denied claims for service connection for hypertension, a right knee disorder, residuals of injury to the coccyx, and a cervical spine disorder. The veteran's claim for anxiety and depression as secondary to VA's adjudicative process is denied as a matter of law.,VA will grant an effective date earlier than August 29, 1995 for the award of additional compensation based on dependents if the evidence shows that the veteran had his marriage and birth of children prior to October 1, 1978.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection of hypertension as secondary to diabetes mellitus. The claims for PTSD and an acquired psychiatric disorder (to include depression, insomnia, and anxiety) are pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2007
The veteran's diabetes mellitus with hypertension and diabetic nephropathy is currently rated at 20 percent, which remains unchanged. The effective date for service connection of these conditions has not been changed.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, venous insufficiency, and varicose veins. The evidence did not establish a nexus between these conditions and active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension did not begin during service or within one year of separation, and there is no evidence linking it to a service-connected condition. The claim for secondary service connection was also denied as there is no medical opinion suggesting a link between the service-connected conditions and the development of hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2007
The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including back injuries, leg and ankle injuries, knee injuries, hypertension, multiple joint pain, stomach disorders, and diabetes mellitus. The evidence submitted since the March 2003 decision is not new and material.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2007
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral foot disability and is now proceeding to evaluate the merits of his claims. The veteran also seeks service connection for cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease, but additional evidence related to these conditions needs to be obtained.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2007
The veteran's service-connected hypertension with hypertensive cardiovascular heart disease and atrial fibrillation is being remanded for further evaluation due to conflicting medical findings. The case will be reviewed again after the examination results are available.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.