Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2009
2,114 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further action, including scheduling a videoconference hearing before a Veterans Law Judge.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2009
The Board has remanded the case for further action, including clarification of representation and potential rescheduling of a hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board found that there is no evidence linking the appellant's current conditions to his military service or any incident therein, including exposure to chemical dioxins. Therefore, service connection for all claimed conditions was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance of another person or by reason of being housebound was denied. The denial is due to insufficient evidence showing that he requires aid and attendance or is substantially confined to his home.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection on appeal are being remanded due to the need to obtain additional STRs and VA records, as well as SSA disability determination records.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, low back disability, right and left lower extremity disabilities were denied. The Board finds that further development is needed to determine the validity of these claims.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2009
The Veteran withdrew his appeals on all issues except for the lung disorder, including as secondary to Agent Orange exposure. The Board dismissed these claims due to the Veteran's withdrawals.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions are denied as the evidence does not support a finding that any of these conditions were incurred or aggravated by military service, including exposure to biological experiments.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's sleep apnea, COPD, hypertension, and CAD are not related to his military service. The claims for these conditions have been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a video conference hearing.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2009
The Veteran's appeals for service connection for depression, a visual defect, and hypertension have been withdrawn. The claims for migraine headaches, seizures, and low sperm count due to radiation exposure are dismissed as unsupported by the evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a Travel Board hearing. The issues of service connection and disability rating remain on hold until further notice.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2009
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, and the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2009
The Veteran's hypertension is found to be aggravated by her service-connected hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and hormone replacement therapy, thus warranting secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected low back disability did not cause or aggravate his claimed hypertension. The Board also found that there is no evidence of permanent worsening of the Veteran's chronic hypertension due to his service-connected lumbar spine disability, thus denying secondary service connection for hypertension. Service connection for bilateral lower extremity weakness was granted as a result of the Veteran's spinal cord injury.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's cervical arthritis does not warrant a rating in excess of 20 percent prior to June 24, 2007 and does not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 30 percent as of June 24, 2007. The Veteran's hypertension has also been evaluated at 10 percent since August 25, 2003.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board found no evidence of hypertension in service or until more than 10 years after service, and concluded that the Veteran's current hypertension is not related to service or a service-connected condition. The claim for service connection was therefore denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2009
The Board has granted service connection for residuals of a thoracotomy, but denied the claim of service connection for hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension was not caused or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD or diabetes mellitus, and denied the claim for service connection. The tinnitus claim is also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2009
The Veteran's hypertension and erectile dysfunction are found to be related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.