Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2009
2,114 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2009
The Veteran's hypertension was aggravated by his service-connected sinusitis, and therefore, service connection for hypertension is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Veteran does not meet the criteria for special monthly pension based upon the need for regular aid and attendance or by reason of being housebound.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied service connection for the claimed conditions as there was no evidence of a current disability, or that any of the claimed disabilities were incurred in active military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, as none of the listed causes were related to his service or a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The veteran's initial ratings for left eye macular degeneration, hypertension, and hiatal hernia were denied as the evidence did not support higher or compensable evaluations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and readjudication of the claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal is being remanded to the RO for scheduling of a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased disability rating, service connection for allergies and secondary conditions, and new and material evidence to reopen a claim of service connection for PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's heart disability, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction did not have onset during active service, did not manifest within one year of separation from active duty, and are not otherwise etiology related to the Veteran's active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and skin rashes, finding no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and his military service or any service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death as the result of exposure to ionizing radiation, finding no evidence linking the causes of his death (atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, diabetes, and hypertension) to his military service or exposure to ionizing radiation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal is remanded to the RO for further development and consideration of the claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection, as there was no evidence of a disability associated with chest pains, recurrent headaches, or a sleep disorder, and the hypertension did not meet criteria for an evaluation greater than 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied service connection for actinic keratosis, coronary artery disease, and hypertension as they were not incurred during active military service and are not related to any incident thereof, including exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Board denied service connection for hypertension and coronary artery disease, finding no evidence linking these conditions to the Veteran's service or his service-connected PTSD.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2009
The Board granted service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but denied service connection for a skin disorder, migraines, hypertension, bilateral arm pain, and a disorder with symptoms including short term memory loss. The claim for exposure to Agent Orange was also denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2009
The claim for service connection for hypertension was reopened based on new and material evidence, but the Board found that there is no competent medical evidence to support a link between the Veteran's current hypertension and his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2009
The appeal was remanded for additional medical evidence to support the claim of service connection for ischemic heart disease and hypertension as secondary to PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2009
The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for hypertension was denied, as the evidence did not show diastolic pressure predominantly at or above 110 or systolic pressure predominantly at or above 200. The claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction on a secondary basis was also denied due to lack of sufficient evidence linking it to his service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2009
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was remanded, while the claim for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for hypertension was denied.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.