Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2012
1,931 indexed Board decisions in 2012.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Veteran's hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy were found to be rated at the maximum allowable under VA regulations. The Board denied service connection for sleep apnea as secondary to his service-connected conditions, including hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board found no evidence of the Veteran's exposure to Agent Orange and thus could not grant service connection for prostate cancer or hypertension on a presumptive basis. The claims were also denied as there is insufficient medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Veteran's appeals for a higher evaluation for diabetes and SMC based on need for aid and attendance or housebound status are being remanded to allow for additional development of the claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and muscle spasms of the lower legs. The reasons were that the Veteran did not serve in Vietnam during the Vietnam era, there was no evidence of herbicide exposure, and the conditions are not presumed to be related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension is being remanded due to the need for clarification of medical opinions regarding the relationship between his hypertension and diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension is being remanded due to the need for clarification of his military service periods and further medical examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development to determine if he was exposed to herbicides during service and whether his claimed conditions are related to such exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including left ear hearing loss, right upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, skin disability, bladder disability, kidney disability, liver disability, headaches, hypertension, and GERD. The decision did not address any presumptive exposure to herbicides or other specific exposures.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Board has determined that the Appellant needs further examination and opinion regarding his claims for service connection for left ear hearing loss, hypertension, and prostate disorder. The case is being remanded to obtain these necessary evaluations.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, finding that new and material evidence was not submitted to reopen his claims. The appeals were based on direct service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · November 2012
The Board granted service connection for the Veteran's lung disorder, heart disorder, hypertension, liver disorder (including hepatitis), and thyroid disorder, all presumed to be due to Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's hypertension is related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board denied a compensable rating for hypertension as the Veteran's diastolic pressure was not predominantly 100 or more, and he did not have a history of requiring continuous medication to control his condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · November 2012
The Board has granted service connection for right renal artery stenosis, but the claims for a genitourinary disorder other than right renal artery stenosis, hypertension, and hypercoagulability disorder are remanded due to insufficient medical nexus opinions.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for PTSD, an acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD, a neck disability, and hypertension as new and material evidence was not received to reopen these claims. The Board also found that there is no medical evidence linking these disabilities to active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling VA examinations to determine if any of the Veteran's claimed disabilities are related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Veteran's combined disability rating is at least 90%, but the Board finds that his service-connected disabilities do not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Veteran's claim for TDIU and DEA eligibility during the period from March 28, 2004 to March 27, 2005 was denied as he had marginal employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's chronic hypertension and coronary artery disease are related to his active service, granting service connection for both conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), finding that there was no evidence of in-service onset or a nexus to service-connected disability.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.