Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2012
1,931 indexed Board decisions in 2012.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's hypertension is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The TDIU claim will be held in abeyance pending resolution of the hypertension issue.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart disability, and peripheral neuropathy of the extremities as there was no evidence of herbicide exposure during service. The Veteran's current conditions are not shown to be related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current hypertension condition did not manifest during his second period of active service and is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to service. As such, the claim for service connection for hypertension is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability, tinnitus, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and right knee disability. The evidence did not establish a nexus between these conditions and service.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Veteran's PTSD is currently rated at 70 percent, and he is granted TDIU based on his service-connected PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for reopening his service connection claim for a psychiatric disorder, increased ratings for hypertension, and compensable ratings for nasal bone fracture residuals and scalp scars. The evidence did not meet the criteria to reopen the claim of service connection for a psychiatric disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension, which he claims is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The Board has determined that further development is needed before a decision can be made.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran's hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy have been granted service connection, but the Board is remanding his claims for higher initial ratings due to further development being required.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus Type 2 was reopened and granted based on exposure to herbicides in service. Service connection is also granted for hypertension as secondary to diabetes mellitus Type 2, but not for peripheral neuropathy or a bilateral eye disorder. The claim for renal insufficiency remains pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Board has remanded the case for scheduling a videoconference hearing at the RO. The Veteran's claims of service connection for sleep disorder, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension are pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Veteran's combined rating for service-connected disabilities is 100%, meeting the percentage requirements for a TDIU. However, the weight of medical opinion and other evidence indicates that his service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Veteran's hypertension was not shown during service or within one year of separation, and there is no medical evidence linking his current condition to service. The VA examiner found that the Veteran's blood pressure elevation preceded his diabetes mellitus diagnosis.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Board has determined that hypertension was manifested within a year of separation from service and grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board found no evidence of hypertension or eye disability during service, and thus denied the Veteran's claims for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining an opinion on whether the Veteran's hypertension is aggravated by his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension is at least as likely as not aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and thus grants service connection for hypertension secondary to diabetes.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's claimed erectile dysfunction, finding that it is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus or other service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension was not incurred in or aggravated by service, including exposure to Agent Orange. The condition is also not considered a presumptive condition for VA purposes. Additionally, there is no evidence showing that the hypertension was caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus or PTSD.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board found that hypertension did not manifest in service, within the one year presumptive period or for many years thereafter, and is not otherwise related to service. It was also determined that it may not be presumed to have been incurred therein, and is not proximately due to, the result of, or aggravated by service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board has determined that there is no evidence to support the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and a heart disorder, as these conditions are not shown to be related to his active military service or presumed exposure to herbicides. The preponderance of the evidence does not support a grant of service connection.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.