Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2012
1,931 indexed Board decisions in 2012.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain additional VA examinations and to obtain a complete copy of his VA treatment records. The claims for service connection for hypertension, increased rating for DMII, and compensable hearing loss are all pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's hypertension is currently rated at 10 percent, but the Board finds that his diastolic pressure is predominantly under 100 and systolic pressure is predominantly under 160. Therefore, a higher rating for hypertension is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2012
The Board has granted service connection for a bilateral foot disorder and an initial compensable rating of 10% for hypertension. The Veteran's cardiac disorder and insomnia claims have been withdrawn.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and a respiratory disorder are being remanded due to the failure of the Veteran to appear for VA examinations. The case will be adjudicated based on the evidence of record.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2012
The Board has reopened the claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and hypertension, finding new and material evidence that relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate these claims.,Service connection is granted for diabetes mellitus as secondary to the service-connected pulmonary sarcoidosis.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension, aortic stenosis, and skin rash/condition are not related to his service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling VA examinations. The issues of service connection for hypertension and bilateral knee strain are among those that need further review.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2012
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension based on evidence showing the condition manifested within one year of discharge from active duty. The heart condition issue remains pending and will be addressed in a future examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The case is being remanded for a Travel Board hearing and issuance of statements of the case on service connection claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Board has remanded the case for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's hypertension is related to service or caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The RO/AMC must also seek and obtain any relevant treatment records from private providers.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Board found conflicting medical evidence regarding the relationship between the Veteran's hypertension and his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The VA examiner concluded that hypertension was not caused or aggravated by diabetes mellitus, as both conditions were diagnosed around the same time in 1997.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to incomplete service treatment records. The Veteran and his representative are requested to provide additional information regarding their organizational assignments during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for arthritis, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and erectile dysfunction due to exposure to an herbicide agent (Agent Orange) at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam is denied as there is no current diagnosis of arthritis. The Board finds that the evidence does not support a finding of service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Board has determined that further development is necessary before a decision on the merits may be made, including obtaining VA treatment records and service treatment records. A VA examination for the Veteran's bilateral leg disability will also be conducted.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude gainful employment consistent with his education and occupational experience. Therefore, the claim for a TDIU is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a clarification of the VA reviewer's opinions regarding the etiology of the appellant's hypertension.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2012
The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim for service connection for hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's cause of death was due to metastatic rectal cancer, which is not service-connected. The Board found no evidence linking the cancer or its causes to any service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection for left elbow disorder, left carpel tunnel syndrome, and recurrent dislocation of the left shoulder have been denied as there is no competent medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2012
The Veteran's claims for increased disability ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records, including VA treatment records. Further examination is also required to determine the current severity of his service-connected conditions.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.