Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2013
1,798 indexed Board decisions in 2013.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2013
The Veteran's alopecia and hypertension have been granted initial compensable ratings.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · December 2013
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to a failure to obtain deck logs from the USS Annapolis, which may contain information relevant to the Veteran's exposure to Agent Orange and his service connection claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension did not occur during service and is not related to any service-connected condition, thus denying his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension was not incurred in or aggravated by military service, and it could not be presumed to have been incurred in service. The Board also noted that the disability did not manifest itself within one year of separation from active duty. Therefore, the claim for service connection for hypertension was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2013
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain additional evidence and for further development, including a VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected disabilities and their relationship to any bilateral knee disability.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2013
The Board has dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's withdrawal of his claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2013
The Veteran's claim of service connection for hypertension has been reopened, and he is now receiving a compensable evaluation (30%) for his service-connected sinusitis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2013
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate notice for secondary service connection and a need for a new VA medical examination to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's hypertension, including as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2013
The Board has dismissed the appeal due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2013
The Veteran's appeal involves claims for service connection for hypertension and a TDIU. The case is being remanded to obtain additional medical records, provide the Veteran with corrective notice regarding secondary service connection, schedule an appropriate VA examination, and consider the combined effects of all his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2013
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension due to exposure to herbicides, finding no evidence of a current disability or a link between his military service and the condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension did not have its onset during active military service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2013
The Veteran has been granted service connection for hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and bilateral pes planus. The Board found that the evidence is at least in equipoise on whether these conditions were incurred during active service.,Obstructive sleep apnea was noted by the Veteran's former spouse who reported hearing him stop breathing while asleep during his time in service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2013
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for various conditions, including left knee disability, left shoulder disability, back disability, brain tumor, headaches, skin condition, hypertension, and sleep disorder. The evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2013
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied as the evidence did not show that his diabetes mellitus, hypertension with proteinuria (due to diabetic nephropathy), or other service-connected conditions required regulation of activities or insulin use. The Veteran was also found not to meet criteria for a higher rating based on complications.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2013
The Board has determined that the Veteran is presumed to have been exposed to Agent Orange during service and therefore entitled to presumptive service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2. The claim of service connection for hypertension secondary to diabetes mellitus, type 2, remains pending as it was not decided in this decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2013
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records, Social Security Administration records, and personnel folder. The Veteran is also to be afforded a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of her systemic scleroderma, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary embolism, and/or interstitial lung disease.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2013
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities with bilateral Charcot deformities and degenerative joint disease of the ankles and feet result in the need for regular aid and attendance of another person, allowing him to be granted special monthly compensation based on this need.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2013
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's hypertension and its relationship to his service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2013
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, and the case is dismissed.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.