Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2014
2,321 indexed Board decisions in 2014.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2014
The Veteran's hypertension requires continuous medication for control but does not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on diastolic or systolic pressure being predominantly at levels that would warrant a higher evaluation. The current 10% rating adequately reflects his disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2014
The Veteran seeks service connection for hypertension, which he attributes to Agent Orange exposure during his Vietnam service. The Board has ordered additional development due to the need for a medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's hypertension is related to his exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2014
The Veteran's hypertension is proximately related to his service-connected disabilities, including coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and chronic renal insufficiency. The Board finds the evidence in relative equipoise and grants service connection for hypertension.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2014
The Board has determined that hypertension is a chronic disease and service connection can be established through a showing of continuity of symptomatology since service. The Veteran's testimony and medical records support the claim for hypertension, which was present during service and continued after service until now.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension did not onset in service, was not shown to be related to military service or a service-connected disability, and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2014
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to the need for additional development and examination, including opinions regarding service connection for hypertension, erectile dysfunction, and special monthly compensation (SMC) for loss of use of a creative organ.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2014
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple issues related to various conditions, including hypertension, sleep apnea, traumatic brain injury, peripheral neuropathy, and PTSD. The Board has ordered the case back for a videoconference hearing.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2014
The Board has dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedSeptember 2014
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development, including obtaining an addendum medical opinion to clarify whether his hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency are aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current residual disability from heat stroke or cardiovascular disease, including hypertension, and there is no evidence of such conditions in service. The claims are therefore denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2014
The Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and sexual dysfunction as secondary to diabetes mellitus type II are being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD, and thus denied the claim for secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have current diagnoses of a heart disorder or hypertension, and therefore service connection for these conditions is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2014
The Veteran's hypertension is not service connected as it did not manifest during or within one year after his military service.,Coronary artery disease was not diagnosed and there is no evidence of ischemic heart disease.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2014
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and hypertension, finding no credible evidence of herbicide exposure or a link to service. The Veteran's claims were also not supported by continuity of symptomatology.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2014
The Veteran's claims for hypertension, left great toe with degenerative arthritis and hallux rigidus, and right shoulder condition were all granted. The effective date for the grant of service connection for hypertension is March 26, 1992, but no earlier. Service connection was established for the left great toe with degenerative arthritis and hallux rigidus. The claim for the right shoulder condition was reopened due to new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a video conference hearing before the Board of Veterans' Appeals. The issues include service connection for lumbar strain and spondylosis, depression as secondary to these conditions, and hypertension as secondary to these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for scheduling a video conference hearing before the Board.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2014
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension was denied as there is no evidence of a chronic disability in service or within one year after service. The reduction of the rating for TBI from 70% to 0% was upheld based on improvement in residuals of TBI.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2014
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for traumatic brain injury, hypertension, and headaches. The initial evaluations for PTSD, lip laceration scar, and bilateral hearing loss were also denied.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.