Hypertension (high blood pressure) decisions — 2017
2,645 indexed Board decisions in 2017.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2017
For the period from November 4, 1996 to January 27, 1997, a rating of 20 percent for hypertension is granted.,For the period from January 28, 1997 to April 27, 2016, no higher rating than 10 percent is warranted.,For the period from April 28, 2016, a rating of 20 percent for hypertension is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2017
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral knee strain and hypertension, finding no evidence to support a nexus between these conditions and his military service. The claim for right ear hearing loss was also denied as there is no current disability meeting VA criteria.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2017
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for the issue of entitlement to service connection for hypertension, including as secondary to diabetes mellitus type II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2017
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to address the Veteran's claims, including clarification of medical expenses and a determination of whether he required aid and attendance prior to his stroke.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2017
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for the issues of entitlement to a compensable disability rating for otitis media and service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, sleep apnea, ischemic heart disease, GERD, erectile dysfunction, renal failure, peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity, and TDIU. The appeal is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2017
The Board has reopened the Veteran's previously denied claims of service connection for hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The case is now remanded to allow for further development, including obtaining a medical opinion regarding the etiology of these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2017
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to obtain medical records and provide the necessary examinations.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2017
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, has been rated at 20 percent since December 20, 2004. The Board found that the criteria for a higher rating were not met.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2017
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, hypertension, and degenerative joint disease with chondromalacia of the right knee, have rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation. The case is being remanded for further clarification on his current employment status.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2017
The Board denied an initial compensable evaluation for hypertension, finding that the Veteran's blood pressure readings did not meet the criteria for a higher rating under VA's rating schedule.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2017
The Board has remanded the case for further development and an addendum opinion regarding the etiology of hypertension, including consideration of herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current disability related to his reported tumor of the neck, and therefore service connection for this condition is denied. The claim for hypertension was also addressed but no rating assigned as it is pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2017
The Board has remanded the case for further evidentiary development and readjudication. The appellant is entitled to a statement of the case on these issues.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2017
The Veteran's PTSD has been rated as 70 percent since February 29, 2012. He is also entitled to a TDIU based on his service-connected PTSD.,Service connection for hypertension and a right leg disorder have not been established.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2017
The Veteran's service-connected coronary artery disease, PTSD, tinnitus, and hypertension qualify him for special monthly compensation based on housebound status under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114(s).
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2017
The Veteran is granted an effective date of March 12, 2012 for a compensable rating (10%) for hypertension. The issue was not about service connection but rather the timing of when this increased rating should have been applied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2017
The Veteran's hypertension is found to be caused by his service-connected PTSD.,Glaucoma is not found to be proximately due to or aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. However, it is as likely as not that glaucoma was caused by his service-connected hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension and right knee degenerative joint disease were not incurred or aggravated by his military service. The claim for hypertension was denied as there is no evidence of a diagnosis within one year post-service, and the preponderance of the evidence does not support a link between current disability and service. For the right knee issue, the Board found that the Veteran's symptoms are related to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2017
The Board has determined that additional development is needed in order to make a decision on the Veteran's claims, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling examinations for his psychiatric disorder and right foot condition.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2017
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death during the pendency of the appeal.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.