Hypertension (high blood pressure) Board decisions
66,094 indexed Board decisions for Hypertension (high blood pressure).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2019
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings for DM with hypertension, ED, and bilateral nuclear sclerotic cataracts and retinopathy was denied. The rating assigned is 40 percent effective February 7, 2013.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Veteran's claims for higher ratings and service connection have been remanded due to the need for additional examinations and evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are remanded due to the need for further development of the record.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD and multiple musculoskeletal conditions, do not prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation. The Board finds that the Veteran has voluntarily left his teaching job due to anger issues related to his PTSD, and he is currently working as an Uber driver. Therefore, TDIU is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2019
The Board has granted service connection for ischemic heart disease and remanded the issues of hypertension, peripheral sensory neuropathy of upper extremities, and lower extremities.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2019
The Board has granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death due to hypertension, which was listed as a significant condition contributing to his death. The expert medical opinion determined that hypertension had its onset during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for sleep apnea and hypertension due to insufficient opinions regarding direct service connection, exposure to herbicide agents, and secondary service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2019
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for service connection of tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, and hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2019
The claims for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, diabetes, low back pain, sinusitis, hypertension, GERD, painful lower extremities/myalgias, coronary artery disease (heart disease), flu virus, group C virus, adenovirus, skin disability, and right kidney disability have all been denied as not related to service or service-connected conditions.,The claim for a higher initial rating in excess of 10 percent for residuals, fractures, right toes has been remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Board has ordered a remand to determine the etiology of the Veteran's hypertension, including whether it is related to service-connected PTSD or herbicide exposure. The most recent VA examination was found inadequate and new opinions are needed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for ischemic heart disease and hypertension due to inadequate examination. The Veteran is not entitled to a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2019
The Board dismissed the appeal for service connection of hypertension because the appellant requested to withdraw the appeal before a decision was made.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2019
The Veteran's appeals for service connection and increased ratings have been dismissed. The Board has also remanded the issue of a compensable rating for a scar associated with prostate adenocarcinoma.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension has been reopened, and the case is remanded to determine if his hypertension was aggravated by his service-connected psychiatric disorder during his second period of service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and consideration due to insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of the Veteran's hypertension, which may be related to herbicide exposure during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2019
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of aggravation of hypertension during service, and that there was no evidence to show that any other conditions claimed by the Veteran had been aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2019
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension is service-connected as it occurred during his military service and there is no evidence of pre-service onset or other connection to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Board has remanded the case for further proceedings due to deficiencies in previous examinations and records. Specifically, additional medical opinions are needed regarding diabetes mellitus, a VA examination is required for the Veteran's back disability, and medical records from Pensacola Naval Hospital since September 2013 need to be obtained.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for lumbar spine disability, hypertension, and dementia due to incomplete records and insufficient medical opinions. The Veteran's lay statements regarding in-service injuries are considered.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2019
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for hypertension, Dupuytren's contracture of the bilateral hands, and left eye disability due to unclear examination results and need for additional opinions.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.