Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
66,094 indexed Board decisions for Hypertension (high blood pressure).
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including headaches, an acquired psychiatric disability, hypertension, a back disability, TBI, bilateral shoulder disability, and eye disability. The claim of reopening service connection for gout was also denied.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for kidney disease and TDIU. The Veteran was found not to have a current disability related to kidney disease, and his combined rating did not meet the criteria for TDIU based on his service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's Sjögren's syndrome is not service-connected as it did not manifest during or within one year after service. The Board finds that the current diagnoses of CAD and hypertension are not related to his service-connected PTSD.,The Veteran's CAD and hypertension were found to be unrelated to his service-connected PTSD, with the examiner noting that stress could induce heart disease but ruling out PTSD as a cause.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension and kidney disorder are related to his military service, granting both claims.
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development, including a VA examination to determine if his hypertension is related to herbicide exposure in service and for consideration of the issue of TDIU.
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that it is related to his exposure to Agent Orange during service.
The Veteran's hypertension is being remanded for further development, including obtaining a VA medical opinion on whether it was caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes. The initial rating for his diabetes mellitus, type II, is also being remanded due to the submission of a timely notice of disagreement.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to verify the Veteran's exposure to herbicides and to obtain treatment records from Dr. Bagarinao.
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn prior to the Board making a decision.
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for service connection for residuals of a stroke and hypertension, and the Board does not have jurisdiction over these issues.
The Board has found that the Veteran's right and left upper extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy, as well as his hypertension, are due to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The postoperative cardiac surgery scar is rated at 10 percent.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension is not related to his service or a service-connected disability, and thus denied the claim for service connection.
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to assess his employability given his service-connected disabilities, including PTSD. The case will be returned to the Board after further review.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss, skin disability, hypertension, and low back disability. The decision found no current diagnosis of these conditions prior to or during the pendency of the claim, and there was insufficient evidence linking any diagnosed disabilities to military service.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension and strokes, to include as secondary to hypertension, is granted. The Veteran has a current diagnosis of hypertension that was incurred in service, and the Board finds that his strokes are at least as likely as not caused by his service-connected hypertension.
The Board is remanding the case for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records since March 2010 and clarifying where the Veteran has received such treatment.
The Veteran's back disability (lumbosacral strain) is service-connected.,Service connection for bilateral knee disability, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension is not granted.
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II. The claim was reopened due to new and material evidence received since the May 2005 rating decision.
The Veteran's hypertension has been manifested by diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more, but not at or above 110, and systolic pressure predominantly 160 or more, but not at or above 200. The disability does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
The Board has determined that the evidence is at least in equipoise as to whether the Veteran's current obstructive sleep apnea had its onset during service. The issue of service connection for hypertension remains pending and requires additional clarification/new opinion from a VA examiner.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.