Hypertension (high blood pressure) Board decisions
66,094 indexed Board decisions for Hypertension (high blood pressure).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA and private medical records, scheduling a VA examination, and readjudicating the issue of service connection for a bilateral eye disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's PTSD and hypertension are both granted service connection. The issue of hypertension is remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for left ear hearing loss disability, right ear hearing loss disability, bilateral tinnitus, and hypertension. The appeals are resolved in favor of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination. The issues of service connection for hypertension and whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen service connection for bilateral hearing loss are also being remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including issuance of a statement of the case regarding the reduction in rating for hypertension and an addendum opinion on TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's hypertension is caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II and has been granted as secondary to this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hypertension and bilateral hearing loss disability were not incurred or aggravated during his periods of active duty service, and thus cannot be granted service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's heart disease, specifically coronary artery disease and hypertension, has been evaluated at a 30 percent rating since the appeal period began. The current evidence does not support an increase in this rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction is rated at 20 percent, and the reduction of his diabetic retinopathy rating from 10% to noncompensable effective November 9, 2009 was proper. The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is rated as 10%, and his diabetic nephropathy associated with diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction prior to January 28, 2015 is rated at 60%. His peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity and right lower extremity are each rated at 10%. The Veteran's hypertension is not separately service-connected.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran's hypertension is not related to or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction and early peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, nor is it related to service in any other way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2016
The Veteran seeks service connection for hypertension, which is not shown in service or within the initial post separation year. However, he argues that it is secondary to diabetes mellitus due to herbicide exposure and as a result of his service-connected disability. The Board finds that a VA medical opinion is necessary to decide this matter.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Veteran was still gainfully employed prior to June 1, 2009 and thus is not entitled to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability for that period.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current hypertension and basal cell carcinoma are not related to service, but his basal cell carcinoma is aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not manifest in or within a year of his first and second periods of active duty service, and is not related to either period.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension did not manifest in service or within the one year presumptive period, and current hypertension is unrelated to service. The VA examinations concluded that the Veteran's hypertension was not caused by or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's tinnitus is found to be service-connected. Service connection for hypertension and sleep apnea are remanded due to insufficient evidence.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2016
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for the initial evaluations of lumbar spine degenerative arthritis, right knee degenerative arthritis, left knee degenerative arthritis, and hypertension.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Board has granted service connection for a back disorder and migraines, but remanded the issue of hypertension due to insufficient evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2016
The Board found that the Veteran's current hypertension and diabetes mellitus, type II were not incurred in service or related to his period of active duty. The effective date for any future grant of service connection is not specified.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2016
The Veteran's tinnitus was incurred during his active duty. The Board finds that service connection for tinnitus is warranted.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.