Hypertension (high blood pressure) Board decisions
66,094 indexed Board decisions for Hypertension (high blood pressure).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2009
The Board has determined that additional development of the evidence is required, including obtaining service treatment records and personnel records for periods of active duty training (ACDUTRA) and inactive duty training (INACDUTRA). The Veteran's claims will be remanded to consider all new evidence received.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The veteran's service connection for postoperative left shoulder bursitis and tendinopathy was granted, with a 10 percent evaluation initially assigned in October 2007. The evaluation was increased to 20 percent effective February 22, 2007.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has granted an increased rating of 50 percent for sleep apnea, effective as of the date of receipt of the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board denied service connection for hypertension and an abdominal disability due to trauma, to include muscle damage and damage to the reproductive system. The Veteran's claim is being remanded as there were issues with VCAA compliance.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for an autoimmune disease and hypertension, both claimed as secondary to PTSD, have been reopened. However, the evidence does not support a finding of service connection for either condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, which was previously denied in May 1998. The Veteran's history of cardiovascular issues dates back to his military service, including a diagnosis of arteriosclerotic peripheral vascular disease with aortoiliac stenosis and bilateral lower extremities claudication.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's hypertension originated during his active duty service in August 1974, and granted service connection for this condition. The Court affirmed this decision but set aside the finding regarding the pre-existence of the bilateral foot disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has granted service connection for coronary artery disease and hypertension as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected type II diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of a current posttraumatic stress disorder or hypertension related to the Veteran's period of active military service. The Veteran's claims for these conditions have been denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The VA denied a compensable initial evaluation for hypertension from August 4, 1992 to December 2, 1998 and an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for hypertension from December 3, 1998 to the present.,The VA granted a noncompensable evaluation for esophageal reflux and dysmotility.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's confirmed exposure to Venezuelan equine and tularemia during service materially contributed to his death, resulting in gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to massive intracerebral hemorrhage due to hypertension.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2009
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings for hypertension with headaches, fatigue, and dizziness is being remanded due to the need for additional VA records.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2009
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for hypertension, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus has been dismissed as the Veteran withdrew his appeal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board found insufficient evidence to grant the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, erectile dysfunction or loss of use of a creative organ, and PTSD as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The claim for service connection for left eye condition was granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not cause his death or contribute substantially to it. The cause of death, asphyxia due to drowning, was unrelated to active duty service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Board has granted service connection for the Veteran's right index finger condition and denied service connection for his left thumb condition. The claim for hypertension is remanded to allow for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Veteran's service connection claim for hypertension was denied, and his initial rating for a scar behind the right ear status post cyst excision is currently at 10 percent. The Veteran's increased rating claim for bilateral hearing loss after December 7, 2004 remains pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2009
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 50% and his hypertension remains at 10%. The Board found the evidence supported a 50% rating for PTSD but not a higher one.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus and service connection for hypertension, tinnitus, and a skin disability. The decision also addressed his claim of service connection for a bilateral foot condition which was granted in a separate rating decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of a heart condition or hypertension, and there is insufficient evidence to establish service connection for either condition. The claims are therefore denied.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.