Hypertension (high blood pressure) Board decisions
66,094 indexed Board decisions for Hypertension (high blood pressure).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied the applications to reopen claims for service connection for a low back condition and hypertension as new and material evidence was not presented.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for a left hip disability, hearing loss, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. The claim for an initial compensable evaluation for residuals of a left rib fracture was also denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's PTSD was rated at 50 percent, and his hypertension and atrial fibrillation were found to be aggravated by service-connected PTSD.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2009
The Board found that the September 1957 and June 1958 rating decisions proposing to sever and severing service connection for hypertension and anxiety reaction were not clearly and unmistakably erroneous.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension as there is no evidence that it was incurred or aggravated during his active duty or ACDUTRA.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's bilateral hearing loss was rated as noncompensable, while his hypertension was granted a 10 percent disability rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's hypertension and erectile dysfunction are to be re-evaluated for service connection, including as secondary to his diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's hypertension and left shoulder disability were denied higher ratings as the blood pressure readings did not meet the criteria for a 40 percent rating, and there was no significant limitation of motion in the left shoulder to warrant a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's lumbar spine and sciatic conditions were rated at 20 percent, and service connection for hypertension was denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claims for service connection for a psychiatric disability, claimed as depressive disorder, and a lung disability were dismissed due to the withdrawal of the claim by the veteran. The claim for type II diabetes mellitus was denied based on lack of evidence supporting a link to herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for alcohol and drug abuse secondary to PTSD, hypertension, and an exfoliated skin disorder (claimed as chloracne) due to the lack of evidence supporting a direct link between these conditions and the veteran's military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for hypertension as it was not incurred in or aggravated by service and is not secondary to the veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus Type II. The Board also found that the veteran's diabetes does not require the regulation of his activities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension was remanded to obtain additional evidence and schedule a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied service connection for hypertension, a sleep disorder, and pityriasis rosacea as the evidence did not support the presence of these conditions during or after active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, finding no medical evidence linking the two conditions.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's claims for increased evaluations were partially granted, with some conditions receiving higher ratings and others remaining at their current levels.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The Board remands the claim for a new VA examination to determine if the veteran's hypertension is related to his in-service herbicide exposure, specifically Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2009
The veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, hypertension, hepatitis C, and defective vision are being remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2009
The veteran's meningioma and associated residuals, as well as hypertension, were granted service connection based on the evidence supporting a direct link to her military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2009
The veteran's diabetes mellitus, lumbar spine disability, left shoulder disability, hypertension, and peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities were not found to warrant ratings in excess of those currently assigned.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.