Hypertension (high blood pressure) Board decisions
66,094 indexed Board decisions for Hypertension (high blood pressure).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · November 2005
The Board finds that the veteran is entitled to an effective date of September 27, 2001 for the establishment of service connection for diabetes mellitus. The claim was received more than one year after the May 8, 2001 effective date for this change in regulations. The veteran's erectile dysfunction and low back disorder were not granted as service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · November 2005
The Board denied service connection for skin disorder, prostate disorder, hypertension, and low back disorder. The veteran's skin condition is not attributable to service or Agent Orange exposure. His prostate disorder was not incurred in service. Hypertension is presumed due to Agent Orange exposure, but the veteran does not have a current diagnosis of a low back disorder.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that his pre-existing hypertension did not worsen during active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board found no evidence of hearing loss or tinnitus in service, and concluded that the current conditions are not related to military service.,Hypertension was first noted many years after service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The veteran's claim for a higher rating for hypertrophic cardiovascular disease was granted effective October 2, 2003. The Board found that the increase in disability became factually ascertainable on this date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2005
The veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including providing the VCAA notice and obtaining VA medical records related to his May 2003 surgery. The RO must also consider whether he may be entitled to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for residuals of a postoperative embolic cerebrovascular accident.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board found that the veteran does not have hypertension or heart disease that were incurred in service, and denied his claims for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board determined that the veteran's type II diabetes mellitus was not incurred in or aggravated by active service and may not be presumed to have been incurred therein.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2005
The veteran's claims for service connection for a respiratory disability and higher evaluation for hypertension are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and development of evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2005
The Board has determined that the evidence is in equipoise, allowing for service connection of hypertension as secondary to service-connected Type II diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2005
The Board has granted service connection for latex allergy/sensitivity and denied increased disability ratings for hypertension, sinusitis, right knee chondromalacia, and left knee chondromalacia. The veteran's hypertension does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7101.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2005
The Board has granted service connection for COPD, but the veteran's claims for benign prostatic hypertrophy, urethritis, a left varicocele, atherosclerosis with angina pectoris, and hypertension are remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for arthritis in the left knee and hypertension were denied. The right knee arthritis claim was remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his left knee meniscus tear with osteoarthritis, hallux valgus of the left and right feet, hypertension, and pseudofolliculitis barbae with acne vulgaris. The conditions were found to not meet the criteria for higher ratings under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The veteran's service-connected PTSD and left knee disability did not cause his death from cardiopulmonary arrest and cardiac arrhythmia. The Board found that the hypertension, which was diagnosed after discharge, was more likely than not essential in nature rather than secondary to PTSD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2005
The veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension, but the appeal is being remanded due to a lack of VA outpatient clinic records from Sacramento (Stockton Boulevard) in California. The RO needs to attempt to obtain these records.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and avascular necrosis of the left hip, finding that there is no medical evidence linking these conditions to his active military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for coronary artery disease and hypertension, both claimed as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The evidence did not support a finding of direct or presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2005
The Board denied service connection for hypertension and an increased rating for degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further evaluation of the veteran's diabetes mellitus and its complications, including scheduling a fee-basis examination by an endocrinologist.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.