Hypertension (high blood pressure) Board decisions
66,094 indexed Board decisions for Hypertension (high blood pressure).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2005
The veteran's service-connected disabilities, including coronary artery disease with atrial fibrillation and amputation of the left thigh, have resulted in a level of incapacity consistent with loss of use of his right foot. The Board has determined that he is entitled to special monthly compensation based on loss of use of the right foot.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2005
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension with hypertensive retinopathy as secondary to the veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, finding that the degree of aggravation is not easily ascertainable.
- Whole decision: DismissedApril 2005
The veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death. The Board did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of these claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further development of evidence, including verification of service dates and obtaining original service medical records. The veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and heart disease are pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2005
The veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension, which he claims is secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The Board has determined that further development is needed before a decision can be made.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2005
The Board finds that the veteran's hypertension and tinnitus are service-connected, but his left ear hearing loss does not meet VA compensation criteria.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2005
The Board has determined that the evidence does not support a finding that the veteran's hypertension is related to service or due to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and thus denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2005
The Board found that the veteran's claimed conditions were not proximately caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of VA in furnishing medical care. Therefore, his claim for benefits under Section 1151 was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and cardiovascular disease, finding that these conditions were not incurred or aggravated by active service and are not related to any service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2005
The VA denied the appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of her husband's death, concluding that no service-connected disability caused or contributed to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2005
The Board denied an earlier effective date for TDIU due to the lack of factual ascertainability that the veteran was unemployable prior to June 18, 1996.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2005
The veteran died in October 2000 and had pending claims for service connection. His body was not unclaimed, nor did he die while hospitalized by VA. Therefore, the criteria for burial benefits were not met.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2005
The RO denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bronchitis, hemorrhoids, and a cardiovascular disorder to include hypertension. The case is being remanded due to the veteran not reporting to his requested hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not originate during or within one year after his military service and is not otherwise causally related to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2005
The Board has granted the veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension and has also determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen his previously denied claim of service connection for heart disease. The Board found that the veteran's currently diagnosed heart disease was manifested within one year after his active military service, and thus is presumed to have resulted from service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2005
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a new VA examination to determine if the veteran's heart disease with hypertension is related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, Type II. The RO must also issue a Statement of the Case addressing the increased rating claim for DM II.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2005
The Board denied the veteran's request to reopen her claim of service connection for residuals of LSD exposure, finding that new and material evidence had not been received.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2005
The veteran's claims for higher ratings on the scars from shell fragment wounds were denied. The claim for service connection for essential hypertension, secondary to diabetes mellitus, was not considered as it has not been adjudicated by the RO.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2005
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and a sleep disorder. The veteran's claim of service connection remains denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2005
The veteran's hypertension is currently rated at 10 percent, but does not meet the criteria for a higher rating due to consistently low blood pressure readings.,The veteran's macular degeneration is currently rated at 10 percent and meets the criteria for a 70 percent evaluation.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.