Hypertension (high blood pressure) Board decisions
66,094 indexed Board decisions for Hypertension (high blood pressure).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · November 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and heart disease, all claimed as a result of exposure to Agent Orange herbicide. The decision is based on the lack of evidence showing the veteran served within the boundaries of the Republic of Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered additional development as the veteran's claim for nonservice-connected pension benefits is incomplete due to inadequate notice and examination. The case will be returned to the RO for further action.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected disabilities include bilateral arm disability, left knee disability, back disorder, hypertension, pinched nerve in both lower legs, sleep apnea, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The appeal is granted for all issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence. The case will be returned to the RO for the requested development, including a VA medical examination and consideration of the veteran's service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension as secondary to PTSD. The lung disability and skin condition claims are also granted, with the lung disability being related to herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension and chronic acquired right eye disorder are not due to or aggravated by his service-connected generalized anxiety disorder. The claim for an increased evaluation for generalized anxiety disorder is also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence. The case is now remanded to the RO for specific actions related to obtaining service department and VA health care records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The veteran's claims for increased disability rating for hypertension and service connection for a heart disorder and depression secondary to his service-connected hypertension are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2003
The veteran has withdrawn his appeal of all issues related to service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence. The case is now being sent back to the RO for obtaining medical records and arranging a VA medical opinion regarding whether hypertension is caused or aggravated by service-connected psychiatric disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2003
The Board has restored the combined evaluation of 60 percent for hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, which was reduced to separate evaluations. The restoration is effective from when the reduction action took place.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board denied an increased rating for service-connected hypertension, finding that the veteran's diastolic pressure was predominantly 100 or more and requiring continuous medication. The criteria for a higher rating were not met.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The November 9, 1990 rating decision denied service connection for hypertension and heart disorder due to lack of evidence of chronic conditions during or following service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension that he believes is secondary to his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus. However, the evidence does not support a diagnosis of hypertension prior to or concurrent with his service-connected diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board found that the veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, and thus denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to the need for additional evidence. The case is now being sent back to the RO for obtaining medical records related to hypertension.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings and to reopen his service connection claims, finding that the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating or new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2003
The Board has ordered further development in the veteran's case due to pending issues regarding service connection for bilateral hand numbness and a cardiovascular disorder, including hypertension. The appeal is currently remanded for additional evidence collection and examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board has determined that the veteran's hypertension and left knee disorder were not incurred in or aggravated by his active service. The claim for hypertension is denied, while the claim for a left knee disorder is also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a right hip disorder and hypertension, finding that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen the claim for a right hip disorder and that there was no competent medical evidence showing a relationship between the current diagnoses of these conditions and service.
← Back to Hypertension (high blood pressure) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.