Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,735 vetted Board decisions for Kidney disease.
The Board has determined that the Veteran did not submit a timely substantive appeal with regard to his claims for service connection for various conditions. The RO denied these claims in April 2006, and the Veteran was notified of this decision on April 24, 2006.
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased evaluations are being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and records.
The Veteran's lung and kidney disorders are being remanded for additional development to determine if they are related to asbestos exposure during service.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for service connection have been denied as new and material evidence has not been received to reopen these claims.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and personnel records. The appellant's claim for DIC benefits is also being addressed.
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to address the Veteran's claims for service connection, including obtaining records from USAMRIID and providing VCAA compliant notice regarding secondary service connection.
The Veteran's renal cancer of the left kidney and metastatic disease were not shown to be related to service, including exposure to ionizing radiation. The Board found that the Veteran did not have a compensable dose of ionizing radiation during his military service.
The Board found that the Veteran's claimed disabilities were not caused by VA medical treatment, specifically the administration of Felodipine. The evidence did not support a finding that the medication caused or aggravated his existing conditions.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for nonservice-connected pension, finding that there was no pending claim prior to August 21, 2006, and thus denying the claim.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development to determine the etiology of his claimed disabilities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, skin disease, vascular diseases, cervical and lumbar spine disorders, and kidney failure.
The Board found that the Veteran's cause of death was not related to service, including any exposure to herbicides in Korea or Vietnam.
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of a kidney disability was dismissed due to his death.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The maximum schedular evaluation for the status post salpingoophorectomy was granted, but no additional evaluations were warranted.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The Board found that the left femur fracture, fractures of the toes, and hemorrhoids with postoperative perianal abscess are currently rated appropriately at 10%. No compensable rating was assigned for the residuals of a left kidney rupture or chondritis of the sternum.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to determine if his sleep apnea is related to service.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of her husband's death, finding that his kidney disease did not have a direct link to his military service and was more likely related to uncontrolled hypertension and cocaine abuse.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, a kidney condition, and erectile dysfunction. The decision found that hypertension was not incurred in or aggravated by service and is not proximately due to or the result of any service-connected disability. The kidney condition claim was reopened but still denied as there is no evidence showing it was incurred in service. Erectile dysfunction claims are remanded for further development.
The Veteran's death was caused by coronary artery disease, which is service-connected. The Board grants service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death and dismisses the DIC claim as moot.
The Veteran is seeking service connection for renal cell carcinoma, which he contends results from exposure to herbicides during service. The case has been remanded due to the need for further development and review of additional evidence.
The Board has remanded the case for further development regarding the Veteran's claims of service connection for kidney dysfunction and PTSD. The Veteran is to provide medical records, obtain military police reports, witness statements, or line of duty investigation reports, and state any new evidence he may have.
← Back to Kidney disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.