Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
16,735 vetted Board decisions for Kidney disease.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right kidney disorder was denied. The Board found that the right kidney disorder, which is presumed to be due to exposure to herbicides during service in Vietnam, was not caused by his service and is therefore not service-connected.
The Board denied the appellant's claim for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318, finding that the Veteran did not meet the threshold criteria of having been in receipt of a service-connected disability rated as totally disabling for at least 10 years immediately preceding his death.
The Veteran claims compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for various disabilities, including chronic pancreatitis, abscesses, anemia and renal failure, which he alleges were caused by insufficient care received at the VA Medical Center in Kansas City prior to his September 2007 hospitalization.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete VA records from Tuskegee, Alabama. The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions related to diabetes mellitus are being reviewed.
The Board has determined that service connection is not warranted for any of the appellant's claimed disabilities, as none are on the presumptive list associated with herbicide exposure.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's kidney disorder is causally related to service and grants service connection for this condition.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not preclude him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral pes planus was aggravated during service and a left ankle disability was incurred in service. The other conditions were not established as being related to service.
The Veteran's kidney disorder and peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities were not incurred in or aggravated by active duty service, nor are they proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disability.
The Board denied service connection for a blood disorder and kidney condition, both claimed as secondary to exposure to ionizing radiation during service. The evidence did not support the claims.
The Board has determined that a chronic kidney disability was not incurred or aggravated by active duty, or ACDUTRA. The Veteran's condition is considered to have been stable during the periods of service and ACDUTRA.
The Veteran's appeal involves multiple service connection claims for various conditions, including hepatitis C, abdominal disability, head injury/concussion, eye injury/abrasion, black widow spider bite, and asbestos exposure-related disabilities. The case is being remanded to obtain additional medical records and conduct further examinations.
The Veteran's renal cell carcinoma, status post nephrectomy with pulmonary metastasis is being remanded for further evaluation due to potential Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam.
The Veteran's kidney stones are not related to his service or any service-connected condition. The Board finds that the Veteran does not have a current disability related to his claimed anxiety disorder, hypertension, familial tremor, and IBS (abdominal muscle spasms).
The Board is remanding the case for further development to determine if the veteran's service-connected disabilities contributed to his death from end-stage renal disease.
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and a VA examination.
The Veteran's renal carcinoma was not incurred in service and is not presumed to be related to his exposure to Agent Orange. The claim for service connection is denied.
The Veteran's schizoaffective disorder, which began during service and contributed to his death, was found to be service-connected. The appellant is not eligible for special monthly death pension based upon the need of regular aid and attendance or by reason of being housebound.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for kidney failure and neuropathy, finding no new and material evidence to reopen the claim for kidney failure and denying service connection for neuropathy.
The Veteran is seeking benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for acute renal failure, swelling/puffiness of the complete left side of the body, and blocked urine, which he claims are due to VA care or treatment. The Board has determined that additional medical opinion is needed to address these issues.
← Back to Kidney disease overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.