Knee Board decisions
144,625 indexed Board decisions for Knee.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been reopened, but the specific conditions remain unresolved.,Service connection has not yet been established for all of the claimed disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's right knee disability has been granted an increased rating of 30 percent for limitation of motion, with a separate rating of 20 percent for semilunar cartilage condition with frequent locking and pain.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2019
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right and left knee disabilities are not service-connected, as there is no credible evidence linking his current conditions to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2019
The Board has dismissed the appeals for service connection of various injuries and conditions due to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has denied service connection for a low back condition and remanded the issues of service connection for right hand, left knee osteoarthritis, right knee, and bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's low back condition, left knee strain, and right leg disability are all granted service connection. The low back condition is linked to an in-service injury, the left knee strain is secondary to the lumbar condition, and there is no current evidence of a right leg disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's claims for joint pain, back disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder, left shoulder arthritis, right shoulder arthritis, left knee osteoarthritis, and right knee osteoarthritis have all been denied. The claim for allergic rhinosinusitis was previously denied but is being reviewed de novo.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and to obtain updated VA treatment records, as well as additional opinions regarding the Veteran's claimed conditions. The issues of increased ratings for right knee instability; arthritis of the right knee; and, right knee scars are being remanded due to a lack of proper SSOC issuance. Service connection claims for an acquired psychiatric disability and erectile dysfunction are also being remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2019
The Veteran is unable to secure and maintain substantially gainful employment due to his service-connected disabilities, which include right knee replacement with fusion, major depressive disorder, right hip, left hip, and lumbar spine.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has dismissed the issues of propriety of the rating reductions for left and right hip snapping syndrome, as well as remanded several other issues including a TDIU claim. The Veteran's representative withdrew his appeals regarding these issues prior to the promulgation of a decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for right knee, right shoulder, pes planus, and vision problems due to a lack of authorization from the Veteran for his private medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for right knee disability, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, and left ankle disability due to incomplete records retrieval.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to any disease, injury, or incident during service.,The Veteran's bilateral knee disorder is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to any disease, injury, or incident during service.,A pre-existing mastoiditis or residuals thereof was not clearly and unmistakably aggravated beyond the natural progression by service, and a current mastoiditis-related condition is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to any disease, injury, or incident during service.,At no time during the pendency of the claim does the Veteran have a current disability related to CFS. His symptoms are attributed to known clinical diagnoses.,The Veteran's respiratory symptoms have been attributed to a known clinical diagnosis of chronic bronchitis/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is not shown to be causally or etiologically related to any disease, injury, or incident during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various knee and hip disabilities, as well as diverticulitis. The decision was based on a lack of evidence linking these conditions to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2019
The Board dismissed the appeals for service connection for depressive disorder with anxiety and a lumbar spine disorder. Service connection was granted for PTSD and right knee disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection and increased rating for his right knee disorder and right ankle fracture due to inadequate opinions regarding aggravation of his preexisting conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for his right knee disability was granted, with an initial rating of 20 percent for instability and a separate rating of 10 percent for limitation of flexion from the meniscal tear. The current ratings are within the scope of the applicable VA rating schedule.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU are being remanded due to inadequate examinations conducted previously.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient consideration of private medical opinions and historical evidence, as well as the need for additional VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient information regarding the Appellant's periods of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) and inactive duty training (INACDUTRA). The claim will be reconsidered with proper verification of these periods, along with an additional VA examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.