Knee Board decisions
144,625 indexed Board decisions for Knee.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a back disability was reopened, granted. The right knee disability is related to his service-connected right leg fracture residuals and granted. Service connection for left hip disability and sleep apnea were denied. A compensable rating of 10% was assigned for the residuals of fracture in the right leg.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to missing service records, particularly those related to Active Duty Training and Inactive Duty Training.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2019
The Board denied service connection for bilateral knee disabilities and a low back disability, finding no probative medical evidence linking these conditions to service or the presumptive period after discharge.,Service connection was not granted as there is no credible evidence of in-service injury or disease that led to current diagnoses.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a low back condition and right knee condition have been remanded due to the need for further development, including VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for thoracic scoliosis and low back strain, left hip disability, right hip disability, left knee disability, right knee disability, chronic sinusitis, chronic rhinitis, left lower extremity radiculopathy, and right lower extremity radiculopathy due to concerns about incomplete information or bias in the previous VA examinations.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2019
The Veteran's appeals for service connection and increased ratings have been dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2019
The Veteran's conditions, while rated at 70% each, do not meet the criteria for SMP benefits due to need for regular aid and attendance or housebound status.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2019
Service connection is denied for left hip disability, right hip disability, and right knee disability.,Service connection is denied for acquired psychiatric disorder (major depressive disorder and adjustment disorder).,The Veteran's cervical spine and lumbar spine disabilities are remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2019
The Board denied service connection for various conditions, including sinusitis, low back disorder, left and right foot pes planus, functional bowel disease, and right knee degenerative joint disease. The decision found that new evidence did not establish a current disability or link to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a right knee disability, bilateral hip replacement, and kidney disorder have been remanded due to the need for additional examinations. The effective date of the award of service connection for residuals of left knee replacement has also been remanded.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2019
The Veteran's appeal seeking increases in the 'staged' ratings for tinea versicolor, lumbosacral strain, and right and left knee patellofemoral pain syndrome was dismissed as he withdrew his appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2019
The Veteran's lumbosacral strain and left total knee replacement are being remanded for further evaluation.,The issue of a higher rating for radiculopathy of the left lower extremity is also being remanded. ,The extension of the temporary total rating for right ankle convalescence beyond February 29, 2008 is not warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2019
The Veteran's appeals for service connection and increased ratings have been remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and consideration of his claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection of patellofemoral syndrome of the left knee, degenerative disc disease with spondylosis of the lumbar spine, and residuals of a hysterectomy. The effective dates assigned are November 10, 2014 for patellofemoral syndrome of the left knee and degenerative disc disease with spondylosis of the lumbar spine, and May 23, 2015 for residuals of a hysterectomy.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2019
The Board has denied service connection for multiple conditions, including left shoulder disability, right knee and left knee disabilities, right ear hearing loss, bronchitis, irregular heart beat and dyspnea, frostbite of the left hand, diarrhea, and residuals of tick bites. The appeals are all denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2019
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for a back disability and bilateral knee disabilities due to insufficient information in the medical opinions provided. The VA examinations are needed to determine if these conditions are related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2019
The Veteran's right shoulder and left knee disabilities, as well as his sleep apnea and tinnitus, have been granted service connection.,Service connection for the right shoulder disability is based on a current diagnosis related to in-service injury. Service connection for the left knee disability is secondary to the service-connected right knee disability.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2019
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed as she withdrew her appeals for the left knee disorder, right knee disorder, and right foot disorder.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2019
The Board has remanded the cases due to missing service treatment records and military personnel records from 1994 to 1998, which were requested under the Veteran's former name (James Lee Brown).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2019
The Board has found that additional development is necessary for the Veteran's TDIU claim due to new evidence added after the SOC, and because the Veteran wishes to appeal this issue. The AOJ will need to consider this new evidence and clarify whether the Veteran wants a hearing on his TDIU claim.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.