Knee Board decisions
144,625 indexed Board decisions for Knee.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left knee disability does not warrant a rating in excess of 10 percent, and his distal amputation of right great toe and laceration injury does not meet the criteria for a higher rating. Both disabilities are rated under the appropriate diagnostic codes based on their current manifestations.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's right knee PFS does not meet the criteria for a higher rating, and his left knee disorder is not service-connected or secondary to his right knee disability.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's right knee retropatellar pain syndrome was rated at 10 percent prior to January 26, 2009 and at 60 percent from March 1, 2010. The Board found that a higher rating of 20 percent for the period prior to January 26, 2009 is warranted based on episodes of pain and repeated effusions, while a higher rating in excess of 30 percent or separate ratings are not warranted due to lack of evidence of flexion limited to 15 degrees or extension limited to 20 degrees. The Veteran's left eye toxoplasmosis of the retina was rated at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's claimed joint pain, calcaneal spurs, bilateral degenerative joint disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joints, knee strain and right elbow epicondylitis are not shown to be causally or etiologically related to his military service. The Board finds that these conditions were diagnosed after discharge from service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's left knee chondromalacia has been rated at 20 percent since November 1992. The Board finds that the evidence does not support a higher rating for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The case is being remanded to the RO for further development and consideration of the Veteran's claims, including addressing the issue of aggravation of a right lower-leg disorder by service-connected left tibia fracture residuals.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Veteran's appeal was denied as his service-connected right ankle disability did not warrant a higher rating during the periods specified.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current right ankle and knee disabilities are related to his in-service ACDUTRA injury, granting service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's right ear hearing loss is found to be at least as likely as not related to active service, and the claim for service connection for this condition is granted. The claims for bilateral eye disability and right knee disability are remanded for further examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's unauthorized medical expenses for treatment at Capital Regional Medical Center on December 4, 2011 are approved because the condition was of such a nature that a prudent layperson would have reasonably expected delay in seeking immediate medical attention to be hazardous to life or health and VA facilities were not feasibly available.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Veteran's claims for higher ratings for lumbar spondylosis with intervertebral disc syndrome, radiculopathy of the right sciatic nerve, osteoarthritis of the right knee, and right knee instability are being remanded due to outstanding VA treatment records potentially pertinent to these matters.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and providing a new examination to determine if the Veteran's bilateral knee disorders are related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Board found that there is no evidence of a current right leg, hip, or knee disorder related to the Veteran's active duty service. The appeals for service connection are denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's back strain, right knee strain, and patella-femoral syndrome of both knees are related to his active service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's service-connected right knee DJD is rated at 10 percent, and he is also entitled to a separate 10 percent rating for symptomatic removal of the semilunar cartilage. The higher ratings are not warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to inadequate examinations and failure to provide adequate reasons and bases for denial of service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU is being remanded due to the need for clarification of the VA physician's opinion in his discharge application and consideration of CUE in the July 2012 rating decision regarding service connection for hypertension.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2016
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the current level of disability of her right knee disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2016
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevented him from maintaining substantial gainful employment since April 10, 2007. The Board grants an effective date of April 10, 2007 for the grant of TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left knee disorder is not related to his service or a service-connected condition, and therefore, denied service connection for this condition. The initial compensable disability evaluation claim for tarsal tunnel syndrome remains pending.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.