Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
144,625 indexed Board decisions for Knee.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his right and left knee patellofemoral syndrome, finding that the evidence did not show flexion or extension limited to 30 degrees or 15 degrees at any time during the appeal period.
The Board has ordered the VA to obtain private treatment records from Dr. Keith Roland and then to readjudicate the Veteran's claims of service connection for a right knee disability and a skin rash.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for her service-connected knee disabilities and determined that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen her claim for service connection for a stomach disorder.
The Veteran's bilateral bunions were first manifested during active duty service and are granted service connection. The low back disability, osteoporosis, and left knee disability claims are remanded for further development.
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional development, including a VA examination to assess his ability to obtain substantially gainful employment given his service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for chronic lumbar strain and a separate evaluation for arthritis of the right knee were granted. However, his claim for an increased rating in excess of 10 percent for postoperative residuals of a right knee meniscectomy was denied.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to determine if his back disorder and left knee disorder are related to service, as well as to obtain updated medical records and a comprehensive examination.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim of service connection for a right knee disability, finding that new and material evidence was received to reopen the claim but not sufficient to establish service connection.
The Board denied service connection for lumbar DDD and facet disease, as well as an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for postoperative residuals of a left knee anterior cruciate ligament repair. The Veteran's right knee disorder was not found to be related to service.
The Board found no evidence to support the Veteran's claim for service connection for a left knee disability and denied his claim of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional low back disability resulting from VA outpatient care on July 2, 1980.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO via the Appeals Management Center (AMC) in Washington, DC for further development and consideration of his claims. The issues of an increased rating higher than 40 percent for the service-connected low back disability and a TDIU rating are deferred until after completion of the necessary actions.
The Veteran's claims for service connection for arthritis of the wrists, knees, and cervical spine are being remanded due to incomplete records and potential need for additional examination. The case will be reconsidered with both direct and secondary theories of entitlement.
The Board has determined that the grant of service connection for a left ankle/foot disability was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous, and thus restoration of service connection is warranted. The claim of service connection for a left knee disability remains pending.
The Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a right leg disability is being remanded due to the need for additional medical opinion and possibly missing service treatment records.
The Board denied the appellant's petition to reopen his claim of entitlement to service connection for a left knee disorder, finding that no new and material evidence had been received.,The Board also denied the appellant's claim of entitlement to service connection for hepatitis C, concluding that there was insufficient evidence linking the condition to active duty service.
The Board finds that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and right knee disorder are due to disease or injury incurred in service, granting service connection for both conditions.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for issuance of a SOC addressing his claims and readjudication.
The Veteran seeks service connection for right and left knee osteoarthritis. The Board finds that the exact dates of any Active Duty, ACDUTRA, or INACDUTRA periods need to be verified and correlated with the documented diagnoses of patellofemoral syndrome and osteoarthritis of the knees in the medical records.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to address the etiology of his low back and right knee complaints and the severity of his left knee disability.
The Board found that the Veteran's claimed conditions were not related to his military service and denied all of his claims.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.