Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
144,625 indexed Board decisions for Knee.
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim of service connection for a knee disorder and found that new and material evidence has been received. The Veteran is now entitled to an examination to determine if he has a current knee disorder related to his military service.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining a supplemental medical opinion regarding the relationship between his right knee disability and service-connected left knee disability. Additionally, consideration of secondary service connection for his heart disorder will be considered.
The Board found no evidence of a relationship between the Veteran's current hand, elbow, knee, ankle, and skin conditions with his service. The preponderance of the evidence showed that these disabilities were not incurred or aggravated by service.
The Veteran's appeal includes claims for service connection and increased ratings. Service connection was denied for a low back disorder and gynecological disorders, while the Veteran is seeking higher ratings for her left knee and ankle disabilities.
The Board found that the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of any claimed conditions and thus service connection is denied for hypertriglyceridemia, left knee disorder, right knee disorder, right hand disorder, and left hand disorder.
The Board has determined that further development is needed before the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for right knee disabilities can be properly adjudicated.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for chronic low back, right knee, and right ankle disorders due to a lack of evidence showing continuity of symptomatology or a medical nexus between his current conditions and active duty service.,There is no credible evidence supporting the Veteran's assertions of continued symptoms since service. The separation examination was normal, and post-service records do not show treatment for these conditions until many years after discharge.
The Veteran's left knee disability is not productive of a limitation of motion in the flexion or extension, and therefore, does not warrant an initial rating higher than 10 percent.
The Veteran's right knee disability is currently rated at 30 percent, effective December 1, 2006. The Board finds that the evidence does not support a higher rating.
The Veteran's service-connected osteoarthritis of the right knee was evaluated as 10 percent disabling from March 17, 2006 to August 25, 2006. From August 25, 2006 until October 15, 2006, he was granted a 40 percent evaluation for limitation of motion due to osteoarthritis of the right knee. Beginning October 16, 2006, his disability remained at 10 percent. From October 16, 2006 until February 20, 2007, he was granted a separate 20 percent evaluation for lateral instability of the right knee.
The Veteran's migraine headaches are rated at 30 percent, and his bilateral DJD of the knees is not separately rated as there is no evidence of a separate service-connected condition. The effective date for this rating decision is not specified.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his right and left knee disabilities, as well as a compensable rating for the surgical scar on his right knee, were denied. The Veteran's service-connected conditions are evaluated based on their direct effects without any presumption or secondary linkage to other conditions.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain additional VA and private treatment records related to his bilateral knee, shoulder, elbow, and ankle disorders. The case will be readjudicated after these records are obtained.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected knee disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional examination and consideration of newly obtained evidence.
The Board has granted increased ratings to 20% for right and left knee instability since April 25, 2003, but denied any increase in the disability ratings for right and left knee arthritis.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for gastrointestinal and right knee disorders due to undiagnosed illnesses on a direct basis, finding no evidence of such conditions during or related to his active duty.
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a left knee disability, finding that there was no evidence of an in-service injury or disease and that any current condition is not related to service.
The Board has determined that the appellant's current bilateral knee disability, diagnosed as traumatic arthritis, is attributable to service and grants service connection for this condition.
The Veteran's colon diverticulitis was not present during service and is not etiologically related to service or a service-connected disability.,Service connection for a nervous disorder was denied in July 1997. The evidence received since then does not provide new and material evidence to reopen the claim.,Left knee disorder was not present during service or within one year of discharge, and is not etiologically related to service or a service-connected disability.,Lumbar spine disorder was not present during service or within one year of discharge, and is not etiologically related to service or a service-connected disability.,Residuals of a shell fragment wound to the left ankle are manifested by mild degenerative changes and a scar that measures 8 centimeters (cms) by 1 millimeter (mms). The scar does not cause limitation of motion, muscle involvement, or other disabling effects. A rating in excess of 10 percent is denied.,The Veteran's service-connected schistosomiasis is asymptomatic and therefore does not warrant a compensable rating.,The Veteran suffers no residual disability due to his service-connected rectal polyps.
The Board has granted a 20 percent rating for the Veteran's degenerative arthritis of the right knee from January 29, 2002 to April 27, 2006. The Veteran's residuals of a right knee medial meniscectomy with mild medial compartment and patellofemoral chondritis are not productive of subluxation or more than slight instability.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.