Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
144,625 vetted Board decisions for Knee.
The Board has determined that the veteran's left knee disorder, diagnosed as chondromalacia, does not warrant an evaluation in excess of 10 percent since June 13, 1991.
The veteran is seeking an increased evaluation for her service-connected right knee disability. The case has been remanded due to the need for additional examination and consideration of functional loss.
The veteran's bronchitis with emphysema and torn medial meniscus of the left knee are both rated at their maximum levels, with no further increase in ratings possible.
The veteran's right and left knee disabilities have been rated based on their current functional impairment, with the right knee receiving a 10% rating for arthritis and instability, and the left knee receiving a 20% rating for arthritis and fracture residuals. The ratings are granted.
The veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions were denied. The RO found no current evidence of the claimed disabilities.
The Board finds that the veteran's bilateral knee chondromalacia does not warrant an evaluation greater than the current 10 percent ratings.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for an increased initial rating for his service-connected right knee strain, finding that the evidence does not support a higher evaluation.
The Board found that the veteran's left knee disorder is not related to his service-connected right patella chondromalacia and denied both claims. The veteran's right patella condition was rated as 10% disabling.
The Board determined that the appellant's claims for earlier effective dates for the 20 percent evaluations of his right knee meniscal tear status post two meniscectomies and left knee anterior cruciate ligament laxity are not supported by evidence in the record.
The Board has remanded the issues related to depression, right knee chronic synovitis, and duodenitis for further review. The current rating of 10% for right knee chronic synovitis is maintained. Duodenitis remains rated at noncompensable.
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for various conditions, including arthritis of the lumbosacral spine and other musculoskeletal issues. The decision also noted that new evidence submitted did not meet the criteria to reopen the claim.
The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of a simple comminuted left femur fracture do not warrant an evaluation in excess of 10 percent, as they are manifested by slight limitation of motion and no other significant disability.
The Board finds that the veteran's service-connected postoperative residuals, left knee injury with chondromalacia, is rated appropriately at 20 percent and does not warrant a higher rating.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his scar and arthritis residuals of a right knee injury, finding that there was no evidence to support a higher evaluation based on limitation of motion or other criteria.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a right knee sprain, finding no evidence of chronic disability and insufficient medical evidence to establish a link between current symptoms and service.
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims due to new legal requirements and additional development needed.
The June 6th, 1973 rating action denied the veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities. The March 1949 rating action terminated a temporary total rating for convalescence purposes and assigned separate evaluations for left leg and thigh muscle injuries.
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's withdrawal of his appeal prior to a decision being made.
The Board found that the veteran's left knee disability did not warrant a higher evaluation, as there was no evidence of severe impairment or instability. The claim for service connection for a right knee disability was also denied.
The Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA) has determined that the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected left knee disability is denied. The BVA found that the VA examinations did not comply with the requirements set forth in 38 C.F.R. � 4.40 and 4.45, DeLuca v. Brown (1995), and the guidelines set forth by the VA General Counsel.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.