Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
144,625 vetted Board decisions for Knee.
The veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his service-connected knee disabilities are denied due to the inability to obtain a current address and provide necessary VA examination.
The Board has determined that the veteran's retropatellar pain syndrome of the right knee does not warrant a disability rating greater than 10 percent.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for reopening his service connection claim and for an increased rating for acne rosacea, finding that new evidence did not meet the criteria to reopen the claim or warrant a higher disability evaluation.
The Board denied increased ratings for impairment of the right knee (meniscectomy) and degenerative joint disease of the right knee, finding that the veteran's conditions did not warrant a rating in excess of 10 percent.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his right and left knee disorders, finding that the current 10 percent ratings adequately reflect the level of disability based on pathology.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of left knee injury, finding no chronic condition and concluding that his current symptoms do not constitute a diagnosed medical disorder.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hip disorder and right knee disorder are not well grounded. The evidence does not support a finding of current disabilities or a link between any diagnosed conditions and military service.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected right knee injury, finding that the evidence did not support a compensable disability rating based on the current findings and symptoms.
The veteran's left knee disability is currently rated at 20 percent, but the Board found that it does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his service-connected right knee disability was granted, with a 10 percent rating effective from September 20, 1995. The decision also noted that the RO had previously found a 10 percent rating based on limitation of motion under Diagnostic Code 5010 (arthritis) and a separate 10 percent rating for instability under Diagnostic Code 5257.
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for knee disability and left eye disability due to a lack of competent medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The veteran is seeking service connection for left and right knee disorders. The RO has not obtained all of the veteran's National Guard and Reserve medical records, which may be relevant to his claims.
The Board found no medical evidence to support the veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral foot and knee disorders, concluding that these conditions are not well-grounded.
The Board finds that there is competent medical evidence suggesting the veteran has bilateral shin splints and a bilateral knee disorder as a result of her service in the Army National Guard on active duty for training.
The Board granted service connection for bilateral tinea pedis and assigned a 10 percent rating. The veteran's claims for increased ratings for patellofemoral syndrome of the left knee and right knee are pending.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for headaches and residuals of a head injury are not well grounded. The claim for service connection for left knee disorder is well grounded.
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss and bilateral knee arthritis, finding that the veteran's current conditions are related to his military service.
The veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings have been granted. The gastrointestinal disorder is considered due to an undiagnosed illness, while the right wrist fracture and left knee disability are related to exposure to asbestos, hydraulic fuel, jet fuel, and synthetic oils. No new rating has been assigned as the appeal was reopened based on new evidence.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for chondromalacia of the patella of the left knee and residuals of a back injury with cervical and lumbar myalgias, finding that the current evidence did not support higher ratings based on the degree of limitation of motion or instability.
The veteran's liver disability is rated at 50% for accrued benefits purposes, and his right hip and left knee disabilities are each rated at 10%. The claim of new and material evidence for the right knee disability has been granted.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.