Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) decisions — 2002
185 indexed Board decisions in 2002.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The appellant, the veteran's spouse, is not a veteran or shown to have entitlement to any compensation for residuals of hepatitis C as the spouse of a veteran. The criteria for entitlement to VA disability compensation benefits due to a spouse's hepatitis C infection are not met.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2002
The VA determined that the veteran's service-connected hepatitis warrants a rating of 10 percent, which is in line with the current criteria for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2002
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for scheduling a Board hearing at the RO. The issues of service connection for hepatitis C and a rating in excess of 30 percent for PTSD are pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2002
The veteran's hepatitis C was evaluated at 30 percent from December 1, 1994 to May 21, 1996 and at 60 percent since May 21, 1996. The Board found that the most favorable evaluation under the new rating criteria is 100 percent for any period after July 2, 2001.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's current chronic Hepatitis C to his service, and denied the claim of service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · November 2002
The veteran's hepatitis C was presumed to be due to his service in Vietnam, and he is granted service connection for this condition. His PTSD remains at a 50% rating before December 31, 2001, and at a 70% rating from that date onwards.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated during service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have current disability from a liver disorder related to hepatitis A incurred during his active military service. Therefore, the veteran is not entitled to service connection for hepatitis A.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for Hepatitis C, finding no competent evidence linking the condition to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The Board found that the veteran's end-stage liver disease, status post liver transplant, was not incurred in or aggravated during active service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The veteran's hepatitis A and left ankle injury are service-connected, but his right knee disability is not. The Board denied the claims for hepatitis A and right knee disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2002
The Board denied the veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for hepatitis C, hearing loss, and a back disorder due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2002
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C is related to tattoos received while on active duty, and thus grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2002
The veteran's service-connected status post laceration of the liver with a history of hepatitis C is currently asymptomatic and does not warrant an increased disability rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2002
The Board found no evidence of a nexus between the veteran's current diagnosis of hepatitis C and his service, thus denying the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2002
The Board dismissed the motion for CUE in a previous decision denying service connection for hepatitis.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2002
The Board has determined that the veteran's cervical spine disability, cholelithiasis, and cirrhosis of the liver were not incurred or aggravated during active service. The Board also found no evidence to support a presumption of service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2002
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis and peptic ulcer disease, finding no current disabilities or evidence of their onset during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2002
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in service and denied his claim.
← Back to Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.