Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) decisions — 2005
635 indexed Board decisions in 2005.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The Board has remanded the case due to a failure to obtain all VA medical records from Manhattan, New York. The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C with liver damage will be reconsidered after obtaining these records.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board found that the veteran's liver disability, including hepatitis and chronic liver disease, is not due to service. The VA examiner determined it was very unlikely that the veteran incurred his liver disease during active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board finds that there is no competent medical evidence to support the veteran's claims of service connection for hepatitis C and diabetes mellitus as secondary or aggravated by medications used to treat his service-connected low back disability. As a result, the claims are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis C, a dental disorder, and new and material evidence to reopen his skin disorder claim. The veteran's requests for increased evaluations for residuals of gunshot wounds of the left groin and knees were also denied. Finally, the TDIU was not granted earlier than May 8, 2001.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C, finding no evidence linking his current diagnosis to his period of active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C is being remanded due to the need for a new VA examination and further development of evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The VA has determined that the veteran's hepatitis B does not meet the criteria for a higher rating, and thus denied his claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The veteran's claims for service connection for a low back disability, right knee disability, and hepatitis C are being remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2005
The Board finds that the evidence is in relative equipoise in showing that the currently demonstrated hepatitis C is due to disease or injury that was incurred in active service, and grants service connection for hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by active service. The Board found that the most likely route of transmission for his hepatitis C was intravenous drug use, which is considered a form of self-inflicted injury under VA regulations. As such, he cannot be granted compensation for this condition. For TDIU, while the veteran has multiple service-connected disabilities and completed three years of college, there is no evidence that these conditions are so severe as to preclude him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation consistent with his education, training, and occupational experience.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2005
The veteran's appeal for an initial rating in excess of 10 percent for Hepatitis C has been dismissed due to the death of the veteran.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2005
The Board has granted service connection for a skin disorder and found that the appellant's fatigue is encompassed in his service-connected Hepatitis B disability. The case of gastrointestinal disorder is addressed in the REMAND portion.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bronchitis and cirrhosis of the liver, finding no evidence of a chronic disability in service or within one year thereafter.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board found that a psychiatric disorder was not incurred or aggravated by service and denied the claim. For Hepatitis C, the Board noted that further examination is needed as the claims folder did not accompany the veteran during the examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board denied service connection for hepatitis and a skin disorder claimed as secondary to herbicide exposure. The veteran does not have current diagnoses of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2005
The veteran withdrew his appeal concerning the claim for service connection for Hepatitis C before a decision was made. The issue of PTSD remains pending.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have an ongoing hepatitis C infection and his HIV-related illness is not related to service. Therefore, both claims for service connection are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2005
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have current manifestation of hepatitis, which is a key element for service connection. The claim is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C is being remanded due to incomplete medical records and the need for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2005
The veteran is seeking service connection for hepatitis C, but the claim is being remanded due to outstanding medical records and a need for an opinion on the etiology of his condition.
← Back to Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.