Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) decisions — 2006
689 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2006
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis C is related to his use of intravenous illegal drugs during active service and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2006
The veteran's death was not service-connected, but he had a total disability rating for PTSD that lasted more than 10 years before his death. Therefore, DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 are granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have hepatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, a bilateral foot condition, or a psychiatric disorder due to service. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2006
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination and an addendum opinion to determine if the veteran's hepatitis C is related to his service as a medical corpsman.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The veteran's hepatitis C is rated at 30 percent disabling from January 1999, but the Board found that his disability does not warrant a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The veteran's death was caused by respiratory failure due to pneumonia, cirrhosis, and anemia. The service-connected bilateral cataracts are not considered the cause of death. No other conditions related to service or service-connected disabilities contributed substantially or materially to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been presented to reopen the veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis and gout, both of which were previously denied in September 1979 and May 1989 respectively.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The VA reduced the veteran's evaluation for Hepatitis C status post cirrhosis and liver transplant from 100 percent to 30 percent, finding that this reduction was procedurally and factually proper.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board denied the appellant's claims for service connection for the cause of her husband's death, earlier effective date for TDIU, and DIC benefits pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1318 due to lack of evidence showing a direct link between any service-connected condition and the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) has determined that the veteran's current diagnosis of hepatitis C is not related to his military service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board found that hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by the veteran's active duty service and denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The veteran's hepatitis C has been consistently reported as asymptomatic, and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise. Therefore, the criteria for a higher initial evaluation have not been met.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection of Hepatitis C and an effective date prior to January 6, 2003 for a 100 percent disability evaluation for PTSD. The Board found no evidence linking Hepatitis C to active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis, myeloproliferative disorder, polycythemia vera, hyperkalemia, and hypercalcemia as there is no current evidence of residuals from hepatitis or a link between these conditions and service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for arteriosclerotic heart disease and an increased rating for infectious hepatitis. The veteran was not granted service connection as his claimed conditions were not present in service or linked to military service, and no new evidence had been submitted to reopen a previously denied claim of service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2006
The Board has remanded the case for further action due to inconsistencies in medical opinions and need for additional evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2006
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA medical opinion on the relationship between the veteran's hepatitis C and his in-service symptoms.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have service connection for any of his claimed conditions, including arthritis, osteoporosis, pneumonia, hypertension, hernia, Hepatitis B, and benign prostatic hypertrophy.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's current chronic hepatitis is not related to his in-service hepatitis infection, and thus service connection for this condition is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have residuals of hepatitis C, an undiagnosed bacterial infection (claimed as a Lyme-type disease), or residuals of an immune deficiency disorder. The preponderance of evidence is against these claims.
← Back to Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.