Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) decisions — 2007
702 indexed Board decisions in 2007.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board found no evidence that the veteran's hepatitis C was incurred in service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2007
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination to determine if the veteran's hepatitis C is related to service. The claim will be readjudicated after this development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2007
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and arranging examinations to address the veteran's claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board has determined that there is no competent evidence of hepatitis C during service or for decades thereafter, and no competent evidence of a nexus between the veteran's current hepatitis C diagnosis and his military service. Therefore, service connection for hepatitis C is not established.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board found that the veteran's service-connected hepatitis C did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating based on intermittent fatigue, malaise, and anorexia or incapacitating episodes.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred or aggravated in active service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2007
The Board finds that the evidence supports a grant of service connection for hepatitis C, which was incurred during active duty.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis does not meet the criteria for a higher rating under either the previous or amended schedular criteria, as there is no evidence of minimal liver damage, daily fatigue, malaise, or anorexia. The preponderance of the evidence against this claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C is not related to his active service and therefore denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2007
The veteran's active duty service meets the threshold requirement for nonservice-connected pension benefits due to wartime service. Further development is needed on whether he qualifies for such benefits and on his claim for hepatitis C service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board found no evidence that the veteran's hepatitis C was incurred in service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C was likely caused by receiving contaminated blood during a transfusion at VA facilities prior to 1992, and this event was not reasonably foreseeable. Therefore, compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis C, PTSD, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, and multiple myeloma due to a lack of diagnosed conditions. The appeals were not about Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2007
The veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C was denied. However, his claim for an initial compensable evaluation for residuals of a postoperative left inguinal hernia was granted with a 10% disability rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2007
The veteran's hepatitis C is presumed to have been incurred in service, and his anemia is presumed to be related to herbicide exposure. The VA has granted service connection for both conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for his coronary artery bypass graft, arteriosclerotic occlusive peripheral vascular disease, bilateral carotid endarterectomies, and hepatitis C were denied as the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher disability ratings under VA rating criteria.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The veteran's hepatitis B with cirrhosis did not warrant a disability rating higher than 30 percent between February 2001 and April 2002, the effective date of his 100% rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board has granted service connection for hepatitis B and denied service connection for right renal cell carcinoma, finding the latter not to be related to exposure to Agent Orange during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran was not involved in a plane crash while in service, and therefore, his claims for chest pain, bilateral knee disorder, head injury, breathing problems, dental trauma, scars of the head, face, knee, and ears, hepatitis A, fracture of nose, digestive disorder, scarring of lung, and post-traumatic stress disorder are all denied.,The veteran's service medical records do not show any mention of a plane crash or other traumatic injury. The separation examination did not indicate any chronic conditions related to the claimed disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2007
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis C and reflux disease, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between these conditions and his military service.
← Back to Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.