Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) decisions — 2008
765 indexed Board decisions in 2008.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including hepatitis C, a back disorder, chronic liver disease, depression, tension and anxiety, chronic headaches, and nervous system damage. The decision also addressed his claim for an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2008
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for Hepatitis C and granted it, finding that new evidence supports a reopening of the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection due to lack of evidence showing his acquired psychiatric disorder was incurred in or aggravated by service, and because hepatitis C is not a disease that can be presumed based on its latency period. The claim for hepatitis C was also denied as it resulted from the veteran's own willful misconduct.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran's Hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by active duty service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2008
The veteran's hepatitis C was granted service connection, and a 50 percent evaluation for PTSD since July 1, 2005 is also granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board denied the claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, hepatitis C, and symptomatic hidradenitis suppurativa due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2008
The veteran's hepatitis C with liver fibrosis, degenerative disc disease of L4-S1 with spinal stenosis, and degenerative joint disease of the right knee have been granted service connection. However, his claims for higher evaluations are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The veteran's claims for increased rating, service connection for back disorder, hearing loss, tinnitus, hepatitis C, and respiratory/lung disease (claimed as a residual of asbestos exposure) were denied. The Board found no evidence of current disabilities or service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis C was not incurred in or aggravated by active military service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2008
The Board has determined that the evidence is in equipoise as to whether the veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to secure and maintain gainful employment. The case is being remanded for additional development regarding the etiology of his hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder, chloracne, skin cirrhosis, and a tumor of the left parotid gland. The veteran was also denied reopening his claim for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2008
The Board has granted a 60 percent evaluation for hepatitis C, effective July 2000. The veteran's condition is currently characterized by moderate liver damage including stage three fibrosis and cirrhosis requiring prescribed medications, secondary depression requiring prescribed medication; objective observations of fluctuating weight (including weight loss), abdominal pain and inflammation of the liver; and fatigue.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his duodenal ulcer was denied.,The claims to reopen service connection for hepatitis C, syphilis, and gonorrhea were not supported by new and material evidence, resulting in denial of those claims.,Service connection for a right shoulder disorder was not established.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board determined that the veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability, as his Hepatitis C did not have its onset during active service and there is no evidence linking it to service. The VA examiner concluded that the risk of Hepatitis C due to jet injector inoculations was biologically plausible but less likely than other known modes of transmission such as intravenous drug use.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The veteran's hepatitis C is not the result of VA surgery in February 1971, and it was not caused or chronically worsened by his service-connected gastrointestinal disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2008
The Board has granted service connection for hepatitis C and denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability including posttraumatic stress disorder. The veteran's hepatitis C is considered to be related to his military service, specifically due to tattoos obtained during active service and unprotected sexual contact.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2008
The Board has ordered a remand to obtain additional medical opinions and reconstruct missing service records, as well as to clarify the etiology of the veteran's hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a low back disability and hepatitis. The Board found that there was no evidence of a current disability, in-service occurrence or aggravation, or nexus between the disabilities and service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board has determined that the veteran's hepatitis C is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2008
The Board found that the veteran's death was not caused or contributed to by any service-connected disability, and denied the claim for service connection for the cause of death.
← Back to Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.