Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) decisions — 2009
767 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected conditions did not cause or contribute substantially to his death from liver cancer and acute renal failure.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Veteran's claim for hepatitis C was denied as he does not have the disease. Service connection for PTSD prior to June 17, 2004 is granted at a 50% rating, but no higher. The Veteran's TDIU claim prior to that date was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C has been reopened, but the evidence does not establish a direct link to his military service. The claim for service connection for alcohol dependence was denied due to it being considered willful misconduct.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of hepatitis C, finding that there was no evidence linking the condition to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a travel board hearing and further evidentiary development.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's liver disease, including cirrhosis of the liver, was not incurred in or aggravated by service and denied his claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The appeal of the November 1970 rating decision denying service connection for infectious hepatitis and the denial of reopening the heart murmur claim were both denied. The effective date for service connection for epididymitis was changed to October 10, 2002.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD and hepatitis C are being remanded due to the need for further evidentiary proceedings, including verification of stressors and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's currently diagnosed Hepatitis C is related to his inservice episode of Hepatitis, which was not due to misconduct and occurred during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected conditions do not warrant a compensable rating or service connection, and thus the appeal is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board found no current diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and denied the claim. The Veteran also seeks service connection for hepatitis C, but there is insufficient competent medical evidence to determine if it is related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete evidence and needs further examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Veteran's claims of service connection for various conditions, including PTSD and cyst removal residuals, were denied. The Board found no evidence of current disabilities or a nexus to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2009
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate evidence and a need for further development, including a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hepatitis B does not warrant a compensable rating since April 11, 2005.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2009
The Veteran's current residuals of hepatitis, including an elevated bilirubin level, are related to service and the Board has granted service connection for these residuals.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Veteran's hepatitis B does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating as it does not cause intermittent fatigue, malaise, anorexia or incapacitating episodes.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C has been dismissed due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2009
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran's hepatitis C residuals are related to service, and thus remands the case for further action.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2009
The Veteran's appeal for an increased evaluation for Hepatitis C has been withdrawn, resulting in the dismissal of the case.
← Back to Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.