Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) decisions — 2013
406 indexed Board decisions in 2013.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hepatitis C is being remanded due to the need for additional development regarding his history of substance use and/or abuse.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Veteran's claim of service connection for hepatitis C has been reopened. The Board finds new and material evidence to support the reopening of this claim, but further development is needed before a decision can be made on whether service connection should be granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain additional evidence and for a VA examination. The claims of service connection for PTSD, hypertension, hepatitis C, and psychiatric disorder are all pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Veteran's claims for hepatitis C, cirrhosis of the liver, stomach bleeding, fatigue, hepatic encephalopathy, and esophageal varices are inextricably intertwined with his claim for service connection. The case is REMANDED to obtain VA examinations and medical opinions regarding the nature and etiology of each condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the etiology of the Veteran's cirrhosis, including obtaining records from his phone company and VA medical center. The Veteran was exposed to carbon tetrachloride during service but there are conflicting opinions on whether this exposure caused his condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board is remanding the case to obtain additional medical opinions regarding the Veteran's hepatitis C and alcohol abuse, as well as their relationship to his service-connected PTSD. The appellant will also be provided an opportunity to identify any healthcare providers who treated her husband for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination. The Veteran's claim remains before the Board for appellate review.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to a lack of consideration of relevant medical evidence and an incomplete VA examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2013
The Veteran withdrew his appeal of the claims of service connection for the residuals of hepatitis and a headache disability, as well as for an increased rating for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hepatitis C and bilateral hearing loss, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen these claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection of a low back disorder, right tibia disorder, and hepatitis C. The decision found that new evidence did not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating these claims.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2013
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for an increased rating for degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral spine and service connection for PTSD, hypertension, peptic ulcer disease, and hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2013
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for all issues on appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2013
The Veteran's appeals for hepatitis A, tinea versicolor, right foot arthritis, left ankle injury residuals, and PTSD were withdrawn. The Veteran was granted service connection for hypertension and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. His initial ratings for PTSD and right shoulder dislocation residuals with degenerative changes have been increased to 70% and 30%, respectively.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2013
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hepatitis C is etiologically related to his in-service risk factors, including exposure to air guns and sharing razors. As a result, service connection for hepatitis C is granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's hepatitis C is not related to his active duty service, particularly air jet injector inoculations. The claim for a psychiatric disorder was denied as there is no evidence showing it was incurred coincident with or related to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board found no evidence of a liver disability related to service or service-connected conditions, and denied the Veteran's claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2013
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeal regarding the issues of hepatitis C, residuals of a stroke, cervical spine disability, and psychiatric disability. The Board does not have jurisdiction to decide these matters.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board finds that the Veteran's hepatitis C and resulting cirrhosis do not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 20 percent, as there were no incapacitating episodes or objective findings of malaise, anorexia, hepatomegaly, or minor weight loss attributable to the conditions. The effective date for the award of a 20 percent disability evaluation is granted as December 16, 2008.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2013
The Board finds that the evidence is at least in relative equipoise on whether the Veteran's hepatitis C and acquired psychiatric disorder are related to service. Service connection for both conditions is granted.
← Back to Liver disease (hepatitis, cirrhosis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.