Lung cancer decisions — 2017
181 indexed Board decisions in 2017.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2017
The Board has remanded the case for further development regarding the Veteran's exposure to radiation in service and for consideration of his claim for accrued benefits. The cause of death issue remains pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · October 2017
The Veteran's death was caused by metastatic cancer of unknown primary source, which is presumed to be due to his exposure to herbicide agents in Vietnam. As a result, the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Veteran's COPD and lung cancer did not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation, as his FEV-1 was between 56 to 70 percent predicted or FEV-1/FVC between 56 to 70 percent, which corresponds to a 10% disability rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that there was no evidence to support a link between his in-service asbestos exposure and his later-developed lung cancer. The Board also noted that the Veteran had a history of tobacco use, which contributed to his lung cancer.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2017
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities meet the schedular criteria for TDIU, and he is unable to maintain substantially gainful employment due to his service-connected conditions. The issue of service connection for lung cancer has been remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2017
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and an opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's fatal colon cancer.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2017
The Veteran's death was caused by metastatic small cell lung cancer, which is presumed to have been caused by herbicide exposure in service. The Veteran's diabetes and COPD are also presumed to be due to herbicide exposure in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2017
The Board is remanding the case for further development, including obtaining terminal hospital records and determining whether substitution or accrued benefits claims are appropriate. The cause of death claim will also be readjudicated.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Veteran died from lung cancer, but there is no evidence that a service-connected disability caused or contributed to his death. The Board found the medical opinion in favor of the appellant to be speculative and therefore not probative.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Veteran's service-connected residuals of lung cancer associated with herbicide exposure do not meet the criteria for a disability rating in excess of 10 percent, as his pulmonary function tests have consistently shown levels within normal or near-normal ranges.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's lung cancer is not related to his active service, including any exposure to herbicides or other chemicals. The evidence does not support a finding of service connection for lung cancer.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2017
The Veteran's cause of death, metastatic small cell lung cancer, is found to be at least as likely as not caused by his asbestos exposure during military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Board found no evidence of current disabilities and denied the Veteran's claims for service connection due to a lack of in-service disease or injury, as well as a lack of exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's lung cancer, which was the immediate cause of his death in 1982, is related to his exposure to herbicides during his period of Active Duty for Training (ACDUTRA) in 1959. As a result, service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death has been granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2017
The Board has remanded the case for further development to determine if the Veteran was exposed to Agent Orange during his service in Vietnam, and whether he should be granted service connection for the cause of his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Board found no evidence of negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance of fault on the part of VA in treating the Veteran prior to his death. The Appellant's claims for negligent medical care were not supported by the evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2017
The Board has ordered additional development due to incomplete records and the need for an addendum opinion regarding the Veteran's pulmonary disorder(s). The case is being returned to the RO for these purposes.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2017
The Veteran's cause of death was primarily due to metastatic lung cancer, which the Board finds at least as likely as not incurred during his time in active service. Therefore, the claim for service connection for the cause of death is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer, lung cancer, hypertension, brain aneurysm, irregular heartbeat, headaches, and sleep disturbance are not supported by the evidence of record. The conditions have either no direct link to military service or do not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection based on exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for lung cancer and ED/SMC was denied as there were no prior claims received by VA prior to April 28, 2006.
← Back to Lung cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.