Lung cancer Board decisions
4,666 indexed Board decisions for Lung cancer.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2000
The Board denied the claim of service connection for the cause of the veteran's death due to insufficient evidence linking the cause of death (lung cancer) to a service-connected condition or nicotine dependence linked to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2000
The VA determined that the cause of the veteran's death was not related to his service or any service-connected disability, and thus denied both the claim for service connection for the cause of death and the Dependent's Educational Assistance.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2000
The Board has determined that an effective date of August 31, 1988 for the award of service connection for lung cancer is warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · June 2000
The veteran is seeking SMC for loss of use of a hand. The claims for service connection for lung cancer and loss of teeth due to radiation exposure are being remanded.,The claim for service connection for lung cancer has been deferred pending regulatory changes. The claim for service connection for loss of teeth on the basis of direct incurrence is also being remanded.,The claim for service connection for loss of teeth on the basis of radiation exposure is being remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2000
The Board denied service connection for lung cancer and loss of teeth due to inservice exposure to ionizing radiation, finding no clear and unmistakable error in the original decisions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board found that the claim for service connection for the cause of death due to tobacco use and nicotine dependence is not well-grounded, as there is no competent medical evidence showing nicotine dependence arose during active duty or a relationship between in-service smoking and subsequent lung disease.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board found that the appellant's claims for service connection and benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 were not well grounded due to lack of competent medical evidence linking the cause of the veteran's death to an incident of service or a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2000
The Board found that the veteran's death was due to a service-connected disability, specifically chronic bronchitis which began during active service and contributed to his lung cancer.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the claim of service connection for the cause of the veteran's death due to lung cancer as a direct result of tobacco use in service or nicotine dependence that began in military service, finding no medical evidence showing nicotine dependence during service or that smoking during service was the proximate cause of the cancer.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board found that the veteran's death was not caused by a service-connected disability and denied both the claim for service connection for the cause of death and the dependents' educational assistance benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for heart disability and lung cancer due to tobacco use in service or secondary to nicotine dependence are not well-grounded.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2000
The veteran's claim for service connection for lung cancer was denied because the appeal is moot due to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for lung cancer, finding that there was no evidence of a direct relationship between his military service and the development of lung cancer. The Board also found that any potential secondary or aggravation claims were not well-grounded due to lack of medical evidence linking nicotine dependence or asbestos exposure to the veteran's condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the appellant's claim for a retroactive award of educational assistance benefits under Chapter 35 of Title 38, United States Code, for the period during which he pursued a bachelor's degree between January 1990 and May 1993.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the left breast, claimed as lung cancer, secondary to exposure to Agent Orange. The claim was found not well-grounded.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for lung cancer of the right upper lobe due to radiation exposure, finding that the preponderance of evidence was against his claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2000
The Board found that there is no competent medical evidence linking the veteran's death to service-connected conditions or any exposure basis, and thus denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for compensation benefits for postoperative residuals of lung cancer pursuant to the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is well grounded, and the case is remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2000
The VA denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death due to a lack of evidence linking his lung cancer to his military service or exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2000
The veteran's smoking in service contributed to the development of metastatic lung cancer, which was the cause of his death. Service connection for the cause of his death is granted.
← Back to Lung cancer overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.