Neck / cervical spine decisions — 2006
911 indexed Board decisions in 2006.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedMarch 2006
The veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the increased rating for his cervical spine condition, leaving no issues to be decided by the Board.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a cervical spine disability, an increased evaluation for his lumbar spine disability, and initial evaluations in excess of 10 percent for radiculopathy of the lower extremities. The TDIU claim was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's chronic pyoderma with cervical adenopathy does not warrant a rating in excess of 30 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has determined that the RO did not properly consider the veteran's claims for service connection and remanded them for further action.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's PTSD is service-connected. The cervical spine disability is also found to be related to his service-connected PTSD, and thus service connection for this condition is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran seeks service connection for cervical spondylosis, which he claims is related to injuries sustained during his active duty as a paratrooper. The VA has not obtained all relevant medical records and will need to arrange for the veteran to be examined in order to determine if his current cervical spine condition is due to an April 1963 parachute jump injury or event during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for higher initial ratings for his left and right knee arthritis, as well as his cervical spine DDD. The evidence did not support a rating higher than 10 percent for any of these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2006
The veteran's lumbar spine disability is rated at 60 percent, and his cervical spine disability is rated at 40 percent. The right shoulder disorder and left shoulder disorder are both rated at 10 percent each.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's current right shoulder, cervical spine, and low back disabilities are not related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records from VA facilities in Chicago. The issues of service connection and initial evaluations for his wrist carpal tunnel syndrome and headaches will be reconsidered after these records are obtained.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including scheduling VA examinations and obtaining medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The VA has determined that the veteran's cervical spine disability does not warrant an evaluation in excess of 20 percent beginning March 12, 1999.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a lumbar spine disability, bilateral ankle disability, and cervical polyp disability due to lack of evidence showing these conditions were incurred or aggravated during her military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that the veteran's disabilities of the spine, including cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine, were not incurred in or aggravated by active service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining evidence related to in-service stressors and PTSD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board has remanded the veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence regarding his claimed conditions and theories of entitlement.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2006
The Board is remanding the case for additional development, including obtaining all service personnel and medical records, as well as VA audiology records. A VA orthopedic examination will be provided to determine the etiology of any thoracolumbar and cervical spine disabilities, and a VA audiologist will provide an opinion on the etiology of any hearing loss or tinnitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed conditions, including left knee disability, hemorrhoids, respiratory disability (manifested by shortness of breath), neck disability, and shoulder disability, were not incurred or aggravated during active service. The Board found no evidence to support presumptive service connection based on exposure to burn pits, Agent Orange, Camp Lejeune, radiation, Gulf War Syndrome, or the Presumption of Exposure Act.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his right knee injury with mild meniscal tear and degenerative joint disease of the cervical spine, both currently rated at 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2006
The Board found that any current residuals of a rib injury or neck/whiplash injury are not of service origin and denied the veteran's claims for service connection.
← Back to Neck / cervical spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.