Neck / cervical spine decisions — 2007
1,049 indexed Board decisions in 2007.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The veteran's service-connected disabilities, which are of a common etiology and have a combined evaluation of 60 percent, preclude him from obtaining or maintaining substantially gainful employment consistent with his education and occupational experience. The Board grants the TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed cervical spine disability and total uterine prolapse were not incurred or aggravated by service, and thus denied both claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The Board granted a higher initial rating of 20 percent for the veteran's degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the cervical spine on and after September 26, 2003, but denied service connection for Raynaud's phenomenon.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for a spinal disorder, but the claim remains denied.,Service connection for bilateral pes cavus with plantar fasciitis and degenerative joint disease of the right first metatarsophalangeal joint is denied as there is no compensable evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied the appellant's petition to reopen his claim for service connection for cervical arthritis, finding that no new and material evidence had been received.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's current cervical spine disability to his service or a service-connected condition, and denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The veteran's appeal is being remanded for further evaluation of his service-connected cervical spine degenerative disc disease to determine the appropriate increased rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The VA denied the veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of her cervical spine disability, currently rated at 40 percent. The evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on severe limitation of motion or intervertebral disc disease.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The case is being remanded for further development, including obtaining all records associated with the veteran's claim and receipt of Social Security Administration (SSA) benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The VA determined that there is no evidence linking the veteran's arthritis of the cervical, dorsal, and lumbar spine to his service. The Board found that the veteran did not provide sufficient medical evidence to establish a nexus between his current condition and his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The Board granted increased ratings for the veteran's cervical spine, lumbar spine, and bilateral knee disabilities under the criteria for arthritis with limitation of motion. The effective date is not specified as it was awarded in April 2006.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The veteran's neck disability and associated shoulder and upper back pain are being remanded for further examination to determine if they are related to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The Board has remanded the case for a new VA orthopedic examination to assess the severity of the veteran's cervical spine injury and to determine if it is possible to separate symptoms of the service-connected cervical strain from those attributable to nonservice-connected cervical disc disease. The claim will be reconsidered based on the updated rating criteria for disabilities of the spine.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for cervical spine muscle strain, onychomycosis and tinea pedis, and allergic conjunctivitis were denied as the evidence did not support a higher rating under the applicable VA rating criteria.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The veteran's request for an increased evaluation of his service-connected cervical C6-7 radiculopathy is being remanded due to the need for new VA examinations and additional development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to ensure compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA) and other applicable laws, regulations, and case law.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)February 2007
The veteran's claim for an increased disability rating and earlier effective date for service connection of residuals of a cervical spine injury is being remanded due to the need for additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board found that the veteran's current cervical spine condition did not start during service and is unrelated to any in-service injury or a service-connected lumbar spine disability. Therefore, service connection for this condition was denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2007
The Board denied service connection for low back disability, cervical spine disability, radiculopathy of the bilateral lower extremities, depression, and genito-urinary disability. The veteran's claims were not supported by competent medical evidence linking his current conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2007
The veteran is service-connected for multiple disabilities, including a right shoulder disability rated at 40 percent disabling. The combined rating of his service-connected disabilities is 90 percent, meeting the criteria for a TDIU rating.
← Back to Neck / cervical spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.