Neck / cervical spine decisions — 2010
1,239 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Veteran's claim of service connection for cervical spine disability is being remanded due to the need for additional records and further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including scheduling a VA examination and obtaining recent medical records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to scheduling issues for a Travel Board hearing and issuance of a Statement of the Case.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for low back and neck disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding the etiology of his current disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of his claims, including obtaining updated medical records and scheduling VA examinations to determine the nature and etiology of any diagnosed conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for headaches, neck disorder, upper back disorder, and lower back disorder were denied. The Board found no evidence of a relationship between the Veteran's current diagnoses and her military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's cervical spondylosis was not incurred during active service and is not proximately due to any service-connected disability. The Board denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's cervical spine disability was rated at 30 percent effective June 26, 2009.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current spine disabilities are not related to service and have denied his claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has determined that additional medical evidence is needed to determine the etiology of the Veteran's current cervical disc disease, and thus remands the case for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a new VA examination and further development of the cervical injuries claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for headaches, neck pain (claimed as arthritis of the cervical spine and rheumatoid arthritis), mid-back pain and HLA-B27 (also claimed as arthritis of the thoracic spine and rheumatoid arthritis), and ankylosing spondylitis (also claimed as arthritis of the lumbar spine) due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Board has granted the Veteran's claims for service connection for nasal deviation, dry eyes, a neck disability, and a low back disability. The evidence is in relative equipoise as to whether these conditions are related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's low back disorder was found to be productive of pronounced intervertebral disk syndrome, warranting a rating in excess of 40 percent. The Veteran also met the criteria for TDIU as her combined disability rating exceeded 60 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to missing medical records and held TDIU in abeyance pending completion of development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has ordered additional development due to the need for VA and private medical records that may be relevant to the Veteran's claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's increased rating claim for his service-connected lumbar spine disability was denied, and the RO found that a higher rating is not warranted. The cervical spine disability claim was also denied as there was no evidence of a direct relationship to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's service-connected conditions do not preclude him from obtaining and retaining all forms of substantially gainful employment consistent with his education and work experience.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical nexus evidence and a need for additional information from the Veteran's National Guard unit.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to unresolved medical questions regarding the relationship between the Veteran's in-service back pain and his current spine disability. The Veteran is also seeking service connection for cervical and thoracic spine disabilities, which are referred to the RO.
← Back to Neck / cervical spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.