Neck / cervical spine Board decisions
47,548 indexed Board decisions for Neck / cervical spine.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has determined that the VA examinations and opinions provided were not in compliance with previous remand directives, and thus the claims for service connection are being returned to the agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ) for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded due to its inextricability with the ongoing increased rating claims under the Appeals Modernization Act (AMA). The initial evaluations for cervical spine stenosis and left radiculopathy of C5-6 roots are also on appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2020
The Veteran's claim for a higher initial rating of 40 percent for cervical spine arthritis with history of IVDS is denied. The disability has been manifested by complaints of pain and stiffness, to include during flare-ups, and objective evidence of limited motion, painful motion, and tenderness on palpation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has remanded the cases for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling examinations. The Veteran's service-connected thoracolumbar spine and cervical spine disabilities are being reviewed to determine if they warrant higher ratings.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2020
The Board has granted service connection for cervical strain, residuals of right shoulder injury, and residuals of left shoulder injury. The Veteran's conditions are deemed to have been incurred during her period of honorable active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection and rating increases are being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and further examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2020
The Veteran's PTSD with alcohol abuse was granted a 100% evaluation effective June 1, 2015.,Prior to that date, the Veteran's PTSD was rated at 70%, and he was denied TDIU prior to January 19, 2011.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2020
The Board denied service connection for left and right shoulder disabilities, cervical spine disability, left hip disability, right hip disability, left knee disability, and right knee disability. The Veteran's claims were not supported by evidence showing a nexus to his period of active service.,Service connection was also denied for left ankle disability and right ankle disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2020
The Veteran's claim for Total Disability Rating Based on Individual Unemployability (TDIU) was granted with an effective date of January 29, 2013. This decision is based on the underlying increased rating claims for wrist and neck disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2020
The Board denied service connection for cervical spine disability, right ear hearing loss, and left ear hearing loss. The Board found that the evidence did not support a causal relationship between these conditions and the Veteran's military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of contact with the Veteran regarding his cervical spine disability prior to April 2, 2014. The Veteran is seeking an increased rating for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and re-adjudication due to procedural issues, including the need to issue a supplemental statement of the case (SSOC) on the claims involving the left ankle disorder, cervical spine disability, lumbar spine disability, and SMC based on loss of use of the lower extremities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are remanded due to the need for updated examinations to assess his thoracic degenerative disc disease, bilateral flatfoot disability, and cervical spine disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of an examination for the cervical spine disorder, and requests that a VA examiner provide opinions regarding its etiology.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has remanded the claim for further development due to incomplete processing of evidence, and the Veteran's cervical spine disability is being reviewed again with additional information.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has remanded the claims for additional medical inquiry due to incomplete addressing of previous directives.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has remanded several service connection claims due to the submission of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2020
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his chronic cervical sprain with mild bilateral facet arthropathy at C5-6 was granted prior to February 17, 2015. The effective date is not specified.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for his neck disability, finding that there was no medical evidence establishing a correlation between his cervical spine condition and his service-connected lumbosacral strain. The Board also found insufficient evidence to support direct or presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected cervical spine and back disabilities, as well as a claim for TDIU. The appeals are now before the RO for further development.
← Back to Neck / cervical spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.