Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
6,543 vetted Board decisions in 2000.
The Board found that the veteran's periodontitis of teeth #2 and 3 was incurred in service, and granted service connection for this condition. The claim for residuals of dental trauma is not well-grounded.
The veteran's Section 306 pension benefits were improperly terminated effective January 1, 1997 due to excessive income. The Board determined that the countable income for 1996 was below the applicable limit and thus the termination of benefits was improper.
The Board denied service connection for Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome, finding that the condition preexisted military service and was not aggravated by active duty.
The Board denied an increased disability rating for the service-connected loss of all teeth and remanded issues related to service connection for multiple disabilities.
The Board denied an increased evaluation for the veteran's genitourinary disability rated as hydronephrosis, currently at 30 percent.
The Board has determined that the evidence received since the November 1988 rating decision is not new and material to reopen the claim for service connection for a bilateral eye disorder, including impaired vision, cataracts, and myopic compound astigmatism.
The veteran's claim for educational assistance in accordance with Chapter 30, Title 38 of the United States Code was denied because he only contributed $100 to the program before disenrolling and there is no evidence that he withdrew his election to disenroll.
The Board found that the appellant's discharge from active military service was based on a period of absence without leave (AWOL) for at least 180 days, which constitutes a bar to VA benefits and health care under Chapter 17 of Title 38, United States Code.
The Board has granted service connection for vitiligo and assigned a 30 percent rating, effective from April 2, 1993. The veteran's condition affects over 90% of his body with loss of skin pigmentation.
The Board denied service connection for neurologic, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and orthopedic disorders (other than a cervical spine disorder) as residuals of thallium poisoning due to lack of competent medical evidence linking these conditions to the veteran's service.
The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's prostate cancer to service, including exposure to radiation. The claim is denied.
The Board found that the veteran's claim of service connection for a chronic gastrointestinal disorder was not well-grounded and denied it.
The Board denied the claim of whether the appellant's injuries sustained in a September 6, 1985 motor vehicle accident were incurred in the line of duty. The evidence received since the April 1993 decision does not bear directly and substantially upon the subject matter now under consideration.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not currently have a liver disorder related to his active service.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected bilateral chorio-retinitis, finding that the evidence did not warrant a higher rating based on visual acuity or loss of visual field.
The veteran's service-connected dyshidrosis of the hands and feet is rated at a noncompensable level, but now receives an initial compensable evaluation of 10 percent.
The Board has determined that the claim for service connection for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is not well grounded and thus denied. The veteran's TDIU claim was also denied as there is no evidence showing she is unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to her service-connected disabilities.
The Board found that the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a right foot disorder is not well grounded, as there was no evidence showing that his current condition was incurred or aggravated during military service.
The Board denied reopening the claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death due to lack of new and material evidence.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected left heel fracture residuals do not warrant a rating higher than the current 10 percent evaluation.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.