Other conditions decisions — 2000
6,543 indexed Board decisions in 2000.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's residuals of cerebrospinal meningitis, including symptoms such as anxious/depressed mood, disjointed thinking, chronic sleep impairment, and mild memory loss, warrant a 30 percent disability evaluation.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board has determined that the appellant's claim for service connection for the cause of the veteran's death is well grounded. The private physician concluded that the veteran's death was due to a chronic pain problem stemming from his service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The veteran's claims for increased evaluations and CUE in prior rating decisions were denied. The Board found no clear and unmistakable error in the September 1945, March 1947, or May 1960 rating actions.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection are not well grounded and have therefore been denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedFebruary 2000
The Board is considering whether new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD. The case will be remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The veteran's service-connected post-operative subtotal gastrectomy and vagotomy for peptic ulcer, with mild to moderate residuals including dumping syndrome and secondary anemia, renders him incapable of securing or following a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board found that the appellant's discharge from military service was under other than honorable conditions due to a prolonged absence without leave (AWOL) for 158 days. The Board concluded that there were no compelling circumstances warranting such an extended period of AWOL, and thus his character of discharge serves as a bar to VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his left thumb and skin disorders are not well-grounded, as there is no evidence of worsening conditions or new symptoms warranting higher disability ratings. The current 10 percent disability ratings assigned for these conditions adequately compensate the veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board denied the appellant's request for payment or reimbursement of medical expenses from unauthorized treatment at Columbia West Florida Regional Medical Center due to lack of evidence showing a 'medical emergency' and that VA facilities were feasibly available.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of an eye injury and a compensable rating for conjunctivitis, finding no competent medical evidence linking current disabilities to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates prior to November 2, 1994 for service connection for fatigue and chemical sensitivity due to undiagnosed illness. The effective date of the liberalizing law was November 2, 1994.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board found that the veteran's skin condition is not a disease for which service connection can be granted based on Agent Orange exposure. The claim was also denied as there is no evidence linking his current skin condition to his period of service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The Board found that the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a skin disorder as secondary to Agent Orange exposure is not well grounded due to lack of evidence supporting a current diagnosis and no medical opinion linking the condition to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The veteran's claims for service connection for lymph node disorder and skin disorder, as well as his request for an increased rating for left shoulder dislocation, were denied. The July 1973 rating action awarding a 10% evaluation for the left shoulder disorder was found to be clearly and unmistakably erroneous.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The VA denied the veteran's claims for increased evaluations for his service-connected shin splints, right leg; stress fracture of the left mid-forefoot; and defective hearing in the left ear. The evidence did not support a compensable evaluation for any of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The veteran was hospitalized for respiratory issues and other conditions. The VA doctor found that the hospitalization was not authorized, and a transfer to a nearby VA facility would have been feasible at the time of admission. Therefore, the claim is denied as the preponderance of evidence does not support reimbursement or payment for medical expenses.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The veteran's unauthorized medical expenses incurred for Hodgkin's disease were denied as the care was not rendered in a medical emergency and VA facilities were feasibly available.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board has granted a waiver of recovery for an overpayment of compensation in the amount of $1,624. The veteran's fault in creating the overpayment is acknowledged, but it was also determined that recovery would cause significant financial hardship and defeat the purpose for which benefits are paid.
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2000
The veteran's bilateral lower extremity disability was rated at 30 percent from June 1, 1990 to January 11, 1998.,From January 12, 1998, the veteran's left leg lymphedema is rated at 20 percent and her right leg lymphedema is also rated at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2000
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has determined that the appellant is entitled to the proceeds from the veteran's NSLI policy, as evidenced by the December 1990 beneficiary designation signed by the veteran and witnessed.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.