Other conditions decisions — 2000
6,543 indexed Board decisions in 2000.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's death was caused by cancer of the lung with metastasis, which is a direct result of his service. Meningitis contributed to his death but was not the underlying cause.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the appellant's claim for service connection for arthritis of the second and third fingers of the right hand, finding that there was no evidence linking his current disability to an in-service injury.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2000
The Board has granted a disability rating of 40 percent for the veteran's service-connected intervertebral disc syndrome with minimal degenerative changes and lower extremity neurological abnormality, effective as of March 22, 1989.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied an increased evaluation for the veteran's right ear infection and cholesteatoma, finding that separate compensable evaluations were not warranted.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the claim for service connection for esophageal cancer, finding that it was not incurred or aggravated by service and did not result from exposure to radiation. The cause of death was attributed to sepsis due to complications including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedOctober 2000
The Board has reopened the veteran's claims for service connection for photophobia, photosensitivity, and spondylolisthesis (which led to a laminectomy). However, there is no evidence of in-service exposure or chronicity of these conditions. The claims are therefore not well grounded.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a cataract of the right eye due to exposure to ionizing radiation, finding that there was no causal link between his claimed condition and his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The veteran's claims for nicotine addiction, lung disability, and hypertensive vascular disease are all denied as they are not well grounded. The evidence does not support the presence of these conditions in service or their connection to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board found that the claim of service connection for the cause of the veteran's death is not well grounded due to lack of evidence supporting the exposure to radiation or other substances in service. The claim for survivors' and dependents' educational assistance was also denied as there were no new medical opinions provided.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for service connection for residuals of a brain tumor and stroke are not well grounded, as there is no evidence linking these conditions to his military service. The claims for reopening service connection for skin disorder, seizure disorder, and psychiatric disability (other than post-traumatic stress disorder) have also been denied due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied a higher rating for the veteran's service-connected Crohn's disease, finding that the current 30 percent disability rating adequately reflects the severity of his symptoms.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2000
The Board has determined that the appellant's request for a waiver of overpayment was not timely filed, and thus remanded to allow for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The veteran's claim for an effective date prior to May 31, 1996, for service connection of urinary bladder papillary carcinoma was denied. The decision states that the original claim was filed on May 31, 1996, and there is no evidence of a prior informal claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board found that the veteran's claim for service connection for gouty arthritis was not well grounded due to a lack of medical evidence linking the condition to his military service. The claim for pension purposes related to gouty arthritis is denied as there are no additional disabilities identified.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied reopening the claim due to lack of new and material evidence, concluding that P.T. did not qualify as a helpless child based on his mental disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for service connection for panic disorder is not well grounded, and thus denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the appellant's claim for Dependents' Educational Assistance (DEA) benefits under Chapter 35, Title 38, United States Code, for periods of enrollment prior to October 1, 1996. The decision was based on the regulatory criteria and legal precedent governing eligibility for Chapter 35 education benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for the cause of his death and entitlement to dependents' educational assistance. The cause of death was listed as sepsis due to pneumonia, which the Board found not related to any service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The veteran's claim for an increased rating and a total rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities was denied. The veteran has a 40 percent disability rating for his bulging disc, L5-S1 with no herniation.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2000
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for a skin disorder, claimed as a rash on hands and for initial evaluations in excess of 10 percent for calluses of the feet, residuals of frostbite of both hands, and hemorrhoids. The appeal was not about service connection at all.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.