Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
6,543 vetted Board decisions in 2000.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for an organic mood disorder is well-grounded, and thus grants the claim.
The Board has denied the veteran's claim of entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for facial and dental injuries incurred during a course of VA vocational rehabilitation, finding that there is no competent medical evidence linking these injuries to any incident of the program.
The veteran's claim for compensation benefits due to adverse effects from medication (Zocor) was denied because there is no medical evidence or opinion that the VA's care, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault caused his disability.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for crushed vertebrae in the lower spine due to a lack of medical evidence linking his current condition to his military service.
The veteran's disability from amputation of the right middle finger at the proximal interphalangeal joint was not rated higher than 20 percent prior to April 1, 1999 and not rated higher than 10 percent on or after April 1, 1999.
The veteran withdrew his appeal to reopen the claim of service connection for bilateral defective hearing.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for right arm tendon transplant residuals is well-grounded and grants the claim.
The Board denied an earlier effective date for service connection of schizoaffective disorder, finding that the claim was not filed until August 11, 1992.
The veteran's claim for service connection for squamous cell carcinoma of the right tonsil as a result of exposure to herbicides is denied because there is no evidence that he was exposed to herbicides during his active service, and there is no competent medical evidence linking his current condition to his military service or any presumed conditions.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for meningioma, finding that there was no evidence of a well-grounded claim.
The Board has remanded the case due to additional evidence submitted by the appellant and the need to locate the veteran's service medical records.
The VA determined that the veteran's left shoulder shrapnel fragment wound residuals did not warrant an evaluation in excess of 20 percent prior to July 3, 1997 and under either old or new rating criteria after that date. The current evaluation remains at 20 percent.
The Board dismissed a motion for revision of a 1979 decision due to the lack of compliance with the requirements set forth in VA regulations.
The Board has determined that it does not have jurisdiction to decide the eligibility for direct payment of attorneys fees, as addressed by the Court in Scates v. Gober.
The Board denied a higher rating for the craniotomy defect, finding that the veteran's condition did not meet criteria warranting an increased evaluation beyond the current 10 percent.
The Board found that the veteran's right eye vision loss was not caused by the June 1993 VA surgical treatment, but rather due to diabetic retinopathy. The decision granted compensation benefits based on a finding of no negligence.
The veteran's service-connected squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue contributed to his death. Basic eligibility for Dependents' Educational Assistance under Chapter 35 is established.
The Board has determined that the veteran's chronic obstructive lung disease is likely to have developed during his period of active service and granted service connection based on exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam.
The veteran's claim for an original evaluation in excess of 10 percent for residuals of a fracture of the mandible with left facial pain/sensory loss is being remanded due to incomplete records and further examination.
The VA determined that the veteran's duodenal ulcer does not meet the criteria for a higher rating, as there is no evidence of active ulcers or recurrent symptoms more than once or twice yearly. The current 10 percent rating remains unchanged.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.