Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
6,543 vetted Board decisions in 2000.
The Board found no medical evidence linking the veteran's current skin disorders to service or any incident of active duty, including claimed exposure to herbicide agents. The claim is denied.
The veteran died from non-service-connected causes and was not in receipt of VA benefits at the time of death, so burial benefits are denied.
The veteran's claim for restoration of a 50 percent rating for his service-connected right forearm disability, which was previously reduced to 10 percent in September 1998, is denied.
The veteran's claim for nonservice-connected pension benefits was denied as he did not meet the eligibility requirements due to his service not occurring during a period of war or the Persian Gulf War.
The June 1956 RO rating decision denied an increased evaluation for the left eye disability, finding no CUE in assigning a zero percent evaluation based on aggravation.
The veteran's claim for service connection for Raynaud's phenomenon was denied because new and material evidence had not been submitted. His claim for an increased rating for subarachnoid hemorrhage residuals was also denied.
The appellant is seeking an earlier effective date for DIC benefits. The case has been remanded due to the failure to schedule a hearing as requested in her substantive appeal.
The Board has dismissed the motion alleging clear and unmistakable error in a July 1995 decision of the Board denying entitlement to an increased rating for traumatic brain syndrome with psychotic reaction, as the motion was withdrawn by the moving party's representative.
The veteran's appeal is denied as he does not meet the basic service eligibility criteria for educational assistance under Chapter 30, Title 38, United States Code.
The Board denied the claim of entitlement to a compensable rating for dysthymic disorder, finding that the criteria for a compensable evaluation have not been satisfied.
The veteran's skin condition was not incurred in or aggravated by active service, nor may its incurrence in service on the basis of mustard gas exposure be presumed.
The VA determined that the veteran's service-connected bilateral anterior tibial compartment syndrome does not warrant a compensable rating due to lack of significant functional impairment.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for his service-connected suppurative otitis media of the left ear, finding that there were no recent findings of suppuration or aural polyps and that the residuals did not present an exceptional or unusual disability picture.
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining medical records and providing an examination to determine if the veteran's ankylosing spondylitis had its onset in service or is related to his service-connected foot disability.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a jaw fracture, finding that there is no current evidence supporting this condition.
The veteran's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of VA improved pension benefits in the amount of $2,299 was denied as it was not filed within the 180-day time limit set by regulation.
The Board denied the veteran's appeal because she did not file a timely substantive appeal (SA) within the required time frame for her claim of entitlement to service connection for vaginitis, squamous metaplasia and dysplasia of cervix.
The Board found no evidence of current disability related to the in-service shell fragment wound, resulting in a denial of an increased rating.
The veteran's service-connected disability did not prevent him from being trained to the point of employability as a secondary education teacher. He has been awarded benefits for his bachelor's and master's degrees, but is denied additional benefits for a doctoral degree.
The Board has determined that there is no evidence of arthritis or other compensable impairment in the veteran's right foot, and thus denies his claim for an increased rating.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.