Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
5,179 vetted Board decisions in 2001.
The Board has determined that the veteran's failure to report income resulted in overpayments of his disability pension benefits. The Board found that recovery would not be against equity and good conscience, as it would result in undue hardship for the veteran and his wife due to their significant medical expenses and limited financial resources.
The Board has determined that recovery of the loan guaranty indebtedness would not violate the principles of equity and good conscience, and thus granted a partial waiver for half of the decrease in property value.
The veteran's death was due to cardiac sudden death, which is not service-connected. The service-connected nummular eczema and stasis dermatitis did not contribute to the cause of death.
The Board has determined that the veteran's low back disability, currently rated at 40 percent disabling, does not warrant a higher rating as his symptoms do not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation under Diagnostic Code 5293 (pronounced intervertebral disc syndrome) or Diagnostic Code 5295 (severe lumbosacral strain).
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a waiver of overpayment of VA pension benefits, finding that recovery would not be against equity and good conscience.
The veteran's claim for VA nonservice-connected pension benefits is denied as he did not serve in the active military, naval or air service during a period of war.
The Board found that the claimant's failure to report her correct income constituted misrepresentation of a material fact, which precludes waiver of recovery of the overpayment of VA death pension benefits in the amount of $20,046.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected left middle finger disability warrants a 30 percent evaluation, effective from March 1951. The right elbow limitation of motion is not associated with the gunshot wound to the right forearm.
The Board has found that the veteran's request for waiver of recovery of an overpayment of improved pension benefits was timely filed, and therefore grants this claim.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination to assess the veteran's left chest and shoulder conditions, as well as any restrictive lung disorder. The veteran may be entitled to separate ratings for distinct manifestations of his service-connected residuals of a gunshot wound.
The Board found that the veteran received overpayment of non-service-connected disability pension benefits due to underreporting his wife's Social Security income. The RO Committee on Waivers denied the veteran's claim for waiver of recovery of this overpayment, concluding that recovery would not be against equity and good conscience.
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a 100% evaluation for his service-connected lung cancer was denied as it was not factually ascertainable prior to July 31, 1998 that the criteria for such a rating had been met.
The Board found that the overpayment of $1048 was properly created due to the claimant's acceptance and negotiation of a check for DIC benefits, despite being aware she was not entitled. The Board concluded that recovery would not be against the principles of equity and good conscience as her fault in receiving the payment outweighed any financial hardship incurred.
The Board denied an increased rating for the veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disorder, maintaining the current 40 percent disability rating.
The Board has determined that the forfeiture declared against the veteran was proper under 38 U.S.C.A. § 6103(a).
The veteran's attempt to reopen his claim for service connection for a skin disorder, to include as due to exposure to herbicides, was denied. The decision is considered 'mixed' because some issues were granted and others not.
The Board has determined that an initial disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent for arthralgia of the thoracic spine is denied.
The Board has granted an earlier effective date for DEA benefits, considering the appellant's eligibility and retroactive application of the benefits as of August 30, 1993.
The Board has determined that the veteran's Hodgkin's disease is currently in remission and does not meet the criteria for an initial compensable rating evaluation.
The Board denied reopening of a claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 due to lack of new and material evidence, as the submitted records do not show additional disability from an IVP performed at a VA medical center on April 16, 1984.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.