Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
4,700 vetted Board decisions in 2002.
The VA denied a higher rating for the veteran's intervertebral disc syndrome, L4-L5, finding that his symptoms are comparable to no more than severe intervertebral disc syndrome.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected deviated nasal septum does not meet the criteria for an initial compensable rating, as there is no evidence of marked interference with breathing space or 50 percent obstruction on both sides.
The Board has granted increased evaluations of 30 percent for the veteran's residuals of cold injury to both his right and left feet, effective from the date of the decision.
The Board denied service connection for the cause of the veteran's death due to colon cancer and liver metastases, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his military service or exposure to herbicide agents.
The Board denied the veteran's claims of clear and unmistakable error in previous RO decisions regarding his duodenal ulcer. The effective date for service connection was determined to be November 28, 1990.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claimed conditions, including PVD and gastrointestinal disability, were not incurred or aggravated by service. The evidence does not support a finding of service connection for these conditions.
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected bilateral foot disability, which is manifested by pain on motion and loss of function due to pain, equates to a compensable (10 percent) disability rating for pes cavus.
The Board has determined that the veteran's bilateral femur fractures do not meet the criteria for a compensable evaluation or an evaluation in excess of 20 percent, as there is no evidence of significant impairment affecting daily activities.
The Board has determined that a higher evaluation is warranted for the veteran's degenerative joint disease of both knees and medial instability of the right knee, but not for pseudo-gout. The effective date remains unchanged.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for a chronic acquired gynecological disorder claimed as residuals of removal of the right ovary, finding that there was no evidence linking her current condition to her service-connected left salpingo-oophorectomy or any other in-service event.
The Board finds that the appellant was not permanently incapable of self-support at age eighteen, and thus does not meet the criteria for recognition as a 'child' of the veteran.
The Board has determined that the veteran does not have a current stomach disorder and there is no evidence of an ulcer, peptic or gastric, to a compensable degree within a year of service discharge. Therefore, the claim for service connection for a stomach disorder is denied.
The VA cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram in April 1984 did not result in chronic abdominal pain, lumps, or masses. The veteran's current complaints of abdominal pain are attributed to other causes.
The Board denied the veteran's application to reopen his claim for service connection for a left eye disability, finding that the new evidence did not meet the criteria of being both new and material.
The Board found that the veteran's thrombocytopenia and erythrocytosis did not warrant a rating in excess of 30 percent.
The Board has remanded the case due to an error in development, specifically regarding the preliminary issue of the appellant's character of discharge. The RO must now determine if the appellant wishes to continue his appeal for pension purposes and whether his character of discharge is a bar to entitlement to VA benefits.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim of service connection for peptic ulcer disease, which had previously been denied. The Board also found that the veteran's peptic ulcer disease is related to his military service.
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to properly evaluate the veteran's right eye disability, including VA treatment records and an ophthalmologist examination. The case will be remanded for these actions.
The Board has determined that the appellant's discharge was under dishonorable conditions due to willful and persistent misconduct, which is a legal bar to VA benefits. The evidence submitted since May 1981 does not constitute new and material evidence to reopen the claim.
The Board has determined that the veteran is entitled to a 10 percent evaluation for Crohn's disease since November 1, 1999. The issue of entitlement to an effective date prior to January 25, 1993, for service connection remains unresolved.
← Back to Other conditions overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.